The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts illustrate the proportion of people from three different age groups in 2000 and 2050 in two countries, namely Yemen and Italy.
At first glance, it is noticeable from the graphs that people between 15 and 59 years old had the largest percentage and have a tendency to increase in 2050 in both countries. By contrast, the figures for the over 60 group were by far lowest.
In 2000, the percentage of the 0-14 years old people in Yemen were the highest, at over 50% and the figure for people at the same age in Italy was significantly lower, at 14.3%. At the same time, the 15 – 59 group in Yemen and Italy made up for 46.3% and 61.6% respectively. Meanwhile, people over 60 years old in Yemen stood at 3.6%, which was the lowest figure, whereas the number of the over 60 group in Italy accounted for more than 14%.
In 2050, predictions reveal that the proportion of people aged from 0 to 14 in both countries Yemen and Italy will drop to 37% and 11.5% respectively. In the same time, it is forecast that the 15-59 Italian group will experience a decrease to 46.2%. By contrast, the figure for those who are between 15 and 59 in Yemen will climb to 57.3%. Meanwhile, there will be a rise of 2.1% in the rate of Yemen’s population over 60 while Italian people at the same age group is predicted to almost double in 50 years.
- The diagram below shows the process of generating electricity from coal Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The diagram below shows how the parts of old car batteries are used to create new car batteries and other products. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagram shows how Liverton docks change since 1980 82
- Some people think that school should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- The plans below show the layout of a university's sports centre now, and how it will look after redevelopment. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.44578313253 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47007215104 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477911646586 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4177624936 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.9 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141217897385 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697280387209 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407203227764 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0999991155091 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378415705996 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.83 11.4140731707 77% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.05 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.