Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Governments are facing a dilemma: there are a massive amount of problems are waited for them to solve, but currently the time and staff are limited. So how could they use the restricted resources to properly address on problems? Some people recommend that they should concentrate on the immediate problems of today instead of those that might occur in the future. From my point of view, such a recommendation is somewhat reasonable, but by no means could administrations ignore the possible issues which can be predicted in the future.
To begin with, it is true that governments should focus on exigent problems as they have already effected individuals or the whole society. Take criminal legislation as an example. Imagine this phenomenon that a large percentage of criminals are more likely to perpetrate the same crimes again after imprisonment, which would no doubt cause panic and chaos in society. This could be confidently asserted as an urgent problem, so in order to prevent these reprobates from committing again, governments should try their best to modify current legislation as well as sentence practice. Otherwise, if they ignore such an exigent issue and then tackle other anticipated problems, punishment towards criminals might lose their efficiency, and thereby criminal rate is less likely to decrease. In short, urgent issues, encompassing crime laws that might cause harmful influence in society if not handle with properly, should take the priority to be successfully addressed.
On the other hand, when current problems could be dealt with appropriately, governments should also tackle the anticipated problems in order to forestall them. A noticeable example is the waste classification that has been implemented in a lot of cities such as Shanghai. This implementation requires people to sort domestic garbage by reusable waste and disposable waste, so that waste plants could gather garbage that could be recycled in order to save resources. To be specific, governments, having realized that there could be a lack of resources in the future, enact a regulation at present in order to forestall future issues. To sum up, governments should also handle with predicted problems if they have more time and energy.
In conclusion, it is truly hard to decide which problem is more urgent for regulators to solve, current one or anticipated one, since they are both considerable. As far as I am concerned, immediate problems should be the priority, but future issues should never be overlooked.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | mohan41 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | louisetse | 66 | view |
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age.Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents and 84
- Some people believe that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime. Others, however, argue that the circumstances of an individual crime, and the motivation for committing it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punishm 84
- The data from a survey of high school math and science teachers show that in the district of Sanlee many of these teachers reported assigning daily homework, whereas in the district of Marlee, most science and math teachers reported assigning homework no 86
- The following is part of a memorandum from the president of Humana University."Last year the number of students who enrolled in online degree programs offered by nearby Omni University increased by 50 percent. During the same year, Omni showed a sign 55
- The graph blow shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 55, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...e facing a dilemma: there are a massive amount of problems are waited for them to solv...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...commendation is somewhat reasonable, but by no means could administrations ignore...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, then, well, in conclusion, in short, no doubt, such as, as well as, it is true, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2121.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 402.0 442.535393258 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27611940299 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96145401717 2.79657885939 106% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539800995025 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 673.2 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.980887906 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.764705882 118.986275619 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6470588235 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.70588235294 5.21951772744 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214489431066 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.07589112245 0.0831039109588 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605771814658 0.0758088955206 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146174953593 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328637675223 0.0667264976115 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.