People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The statement raises a variety of issues about decision making and the conflict between emotion and logic. One school of thought postulates that justifying emotional decisions with logic does not guarantee a substantiated decision. Another school of thought posits that justifying with logic is reasonable because emotions are uncontrollable and disorient people. As far as I am concerned, I agree with the former for the following reasons.
The first thing that springs to mind is that justifying an emotionally based decision with logic, on an aftermath, reveals a lack of sincerity to oneself. To illustrate this, let us consider a woman that decides to move to the country where her spouse lives because she is emotionally attached to him, although this means losing her job. If the woman tries to justify her decision with logic, she will be trapped in finding reasons why she loves the man. This process might disturb her relationship. Thus, trying to justify with logic, after having made a decision based on emotions, not only makes the decision process more difficult, but also poisons human relationships.
Another issue I would like to focus on is that justifying with logic is fruitless on the grounds that some decisions are naturally based on emotions. A case in point would be the decision to get married, which is based on feelings of love and affection that cannot be supplanted by logic. Therefore, deciding to get married based on emotions is not a sign of poor decision making and should not be denounced.
Advocates of justifying with logic underscore that if people where solely based on emotions their lives would get disorganized. Few would disagree that emotional decisions might are not based on arguments and sound thoughts. However, even in these cases, justifying with logic afterwards is fruitless on the grounds that since the decision cannot be altered, the decision maker might become regretful.
In conclusion, deciding based on emotions should not be criminalized. Justifying emotional decisions with logic is fruitless for the above reasons.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-22 | yashincontrol | 50 | view |
2019-12-01 | GREprep021219 | 79 | view |
2019-11-26 | rajeshrawal | 50 | view |
2019-11-25 | amusnakate | 33 | view |
2019-11-07 | Hitzee | 50 | view |
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compel 88
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people 69
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be 54
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the 58
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 335.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22089552239 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80499189044 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501492537313 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 542.7 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.524247521 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.882352941 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7058823529 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.82352941176 5.21951772744 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.421959372859 0.243740707755 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159949186937 0.0831039109588 192% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753627314355 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270865495364 0.150359130593 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259353364801 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.