The table below provides statistics on several major metro (MRT) systems around the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant
This table tells about Mass Rapid Transportation data from six different cities, namely London, Paris, Tokyo, Washington DC, Kyoto, and Los Angeles. We can see that the oldest MRT has ever been built and has the longest distance is London; meanwhile, Tokyo becomes the most numerous costumer per year among the other cities.
The oldest MRT was constructed in 1863 in Europe while Asia followed to build the transportation at the beginning of the 1990s and America pursue it 20 years later. The most mileage is in London with 1100 km to carrying 54 million people per year. The capital city of Japan, Tokyo, transporting 1434 million passengers per year while the other city in Asia, Kyoto, become a country with the least number of passengers and the number of rails with only have 11 km rail to moving 11 million people per year. On the other hand, Washington DC and Los Angeles transport passengers less than 100 million in a year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-13 | radikalyuda | 70 | view |
- The following two pie charts show the results of a survey into the popularity of various leisure activities among European adults in 1985 and 1995 84
- Men and women are different in terms of their characteristics and abilities. For this reason, some jobs are better done by men and others by women.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 56
- Secondary and higher education 73
- Planning Map 11
- Leisure activities of europian adults 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to carrying 54 million people per year. The capital city of Japan, Tokyo, transport...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 33.7804878049 59% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 776.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79012345679 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47342220534 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 221.4 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3786799735 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.333333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 22.9334400587 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.021491569451 0.215688989381 10% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0124634865086 0.103423049105 12% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0124758794447 0.0843802449381 15% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0208580273838 0.15604864568 13% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0118054344753 0.0819641961636 14% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.