The reading and the lecture both discuss whether R. robustus is an active hunter or a scavenger
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether R. robustus is an active hunter or a scavenger mammal. While the reading claims that R.robustus is a scavenger that fed on dinosaur eggs containing unhatched dinosaurs, the lecturer refuts this claim saying that R.robustus is an active hunter.
First of all, the reading asserts R. robustus is smaller than a psittacosaures. Therefore, is unlikely that R.robustus would have been able to successfully hunt psittacosaures or smaller dinosaurs. However, the professor challenge this point by pointing out that it could be true that R. robustus did not hunt a grownup psittacosaures. But it could hunt baby psittacosaures or smaller animal. According to the professor, R. robustous mass is double the mass of baby Psitaacosaures. Consequently, R. robustous could hunt psittacosaures.
second, the reading states that the leg for R.robustus appear much more suited for scavenging than hunting because they were short and located to the side rather than underneath the animal's body. As a result, it is not possible that fast moving psittacosaurs could be hunted by short leged animal. On the other hand, the professor argues the second point of the reading passage saying that Tashmanian Devil is a modern mammal that possessed short legs positioned on the side of the body. this animal was a successful hunter because he could run at 50,000 Km speed to hunt its prey.
Moreover, the reading states that the dinosaur bones inside R.robustus did not reveal any evidence of tooth marks. For this reason, the author suggests that R. robustus simply found dinosaur nest and swallowed an unhatched psittacosaur egg. The lecture casts doubt on the claim made in the reading passage by pointing out that R. robustous had a powerful jaw, it is likely that this mammal swallowed its prey as whole without chewing it. As a result, the absence of both the marks on the prey's bones and the wear on the back teeth of R. robustus indicate that this animal was an active hunter.
- submarines patrol 32 3
- The reading and the lecture both discuss whether dinosaurs were endothermal mammals or not. While the reading states that are three significant evidence that dinosaurs were endotherms, the lecture of the other hand refutes each of the evidence provided in 81
- The reading and the lecture both discuss whether R. robustus is an active hunter or a scavenger 60
- TPO 55 Writing 1 Because of climate change more and more land that was once used to grow crops or provide food for animals is turning to dry unusable desert land There are many proposals about how to stop this process known as desertification A number of 57
- fossils of ancient organisms 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The reading and the lecture both discuss...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that R.robustus is an active hunter. First of all, the reading asserts R. rob...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...robustous could hunt psittacosaures. second, the reading states that the leg ...
^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Second
...tous could hunt psittacosaures. second, the reading states that the leg for R....
^^^^^^
Line 11, column 489, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...egs positioned on the side of the body. this animal was a successful hunter because ...
^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at 50,000 Km speed to hunt its prey. Moreover, the reading states that the di...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, however, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 12.0772626932 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1373.03311258 124% => OK
No of words: 333.0 270.72406181 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10510510511 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82887983479 2.5805825403 110% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 145.348785872 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492492492492 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 419.366225166 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 13.0662251656 176% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.4165788363 49.2860985944 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 73.9130434783 110.228320801 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4782608696 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.17391304348 7.06452816374 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 4.19205298013 143% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.27373068433 351% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370222656933 0.272083759551 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107850249176 0.0996497079465 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156823049045 0.0662205650399 237% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274560352541 0.162205337803 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.255654215899 0.0443174109184 577% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.3589403974 74% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 63.6247240618 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 60.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 18.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.