The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table compares the amount of forested land that six major parts of the world have in 1990, 2000, and 2005. Units are measured in hectares.
Overall, in the late 1990s and early 2000s, it can be seen a great discrepancy in the amount of forest between six different parts, with Europe and South America shared the major forested land while Africa and North America had almost equal proportions.
Despite having the highest amount of forest among others, Europe and South America saw the opposite trend, with upward and downward, respectively. Beginning with 989 hectares in 1990, the figure went up to 1001 hectares in 2005, compared to a fall of South America's proportion, which ended 882. Meanwhile, Oceania experienced stability in forested land (around 198 hectares).
In spite of having a similar amount of forest, the African's figure declined in the same period, from 749 hectares to 691 hectares in 2005 while North America's remain steadily (around 705 hectares). Whereas, the forested land, in Asia, slightly volatile from 1990 to 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-25 | Shivam7090 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-21 | Spring2019 | 73 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | hung253 | 56 | view |
| 2019-11-18 | lyvvu | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-03 | Anbill | 56 | view |
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 89
- In developing countries, children in rural communities have less access to education. Some people believe that the problem can be solved by providing more schools and teachers, while others think that the problem can be solved by providing computers and I 89
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures can be taken to tackle this problem?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
- In the modern world, many children spend a lot of time in front of computers, televisions, and smartphones. This is very harmful to them.To what extent do you agree? 84
- The table below shows sales made by a coffee shop in an office building on a typical weekday.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12209302326 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43583836598 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.1256983204 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.125 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.375 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156819798178 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0751578122243 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525547421255 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109622434852 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349931294966 0.0819641961636 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.