The percentage of male and female teachers in six different tyoes of educational setting in the UK in 2010
The line graphs below illustrate comparisons the percentage of man and women teacher in six different variety of educational setting of the UK in 2010.
Overall, it can be seen that the most obvious pieces of information where that girls absolutely select nursery or pre school which the male prefer to university.
Regarding to the data the most popular demand component by girls was the nursery or pre-school which was tood at 100%, it was followed by primary school marked at almost 90%. Unfortunatelly, at university it became the most decreased category over the period. Only went down about 75%. While on other category also falling significantly to approximately between 60% and 40%.
Unlike with the case above, the boys happened to be most sharply increased which started from nursery get 0,1% then it reached a peak in university dramatically. Then, the second largest percentage obviously at private training institute which counted at 45%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-16 | Mohlaroy Ella | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view | |
| 2023-08-09 | Ngoc Ling | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures from Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 61
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The word question 11
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below Make comparisons where relevant 33
- The line graph compares the production of energy from coal in Sweden France Denmark and Germany between 1995 and 2010 32
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, second, so, then, while, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 803.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21428571429 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84780794994 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.694805194805 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.8209419717 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.375 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144167861452 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645896324877 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.142610093691 0.0843802449381 169% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125219816367 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.181870543859 0.0819641961636 222% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.