Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school.
Do the advantages of this outweigh than the disadvantages?
Presently, learning a foreign language by children at primary school it is better rather than intermediate school in according to expert. A good introduction but not effective for kids. Surely, I vote for disagree about that. knowing of mother tounge is preferable.
On the one hand, acquaint the strange language will make the progeny can not understand the own language maximally. In times of children's play, as parents the mother tongue is increasingly important and build the reflection of neighborhood than other speech. For sampling, kids on the development period stay in their country, socialize with local people and study concerning objects around. Automatically, they should to use sectional parlance not other. However, complicated to find identity from their surroundings. Therefore, they need to be humans who know the environment in which they were born and raised, conversant other introductions to their world.
On the other hand, teaching the terms of overseas in elementary school and get used to using extraneous languages can be easily than when in secondary school. Because in these times, brood can digest well taught everyday from an early age. teaching them will be easier and more efficient than tuition as they are in further education. Awareness other languages as well construct children's imagination expand. High curiosity and praise from others.
In conclusion, delay to teach other argot for minors are superiority inasmuch as vicinal speech be required in the growth times and will be great for child fantasy to achieve information. The opposite, public may decide anything the choice from both of them and attain the goals of the action or decision.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-14 | Elmira Gh | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | trucn | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-28 | Salemo | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-19 | Jesslynindah | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Asadbek2001 | 56 | view |
- The Bar Chart shows CO2 emissions for different form of transport in the European Union. The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples 84
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labeled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European Countries. Summarise the information by selectimg and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society. To what extent do you agree? 89
- The two chart below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in canada in 2005 and 2010. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 227, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Knowing
...Surely, I vote for disagree about that. knowing of mother tounge is preferable. On t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ese times, brood can digest well taught everyday from an early age. teaching them will b...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Teaching
...well taught everyday from an early age. teaching them will be easier and more efficient ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...her education. Awareness other languages as well construct childrens imagination ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, second, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37827715356 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8230857257 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659176029963 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.3853168946 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.4705882353 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7058823529 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.70588235294 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242325955415 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691741234322 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130467749874 0.0667982634062 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164274102701 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145433829591 0.056905535591 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.