TPO 29
The lecturer and the reading discuss how dinosaurs lived on the North Slope. Although the passage claims that the Edmontosaurus was migrating to the warmer place in every winter, the speaker refutes this idea through several reasons which I will describe in this reporter.
First and foremost, the passage points out that the Edmontosaurus eat especially plants; hence, they had to migrate to finding food in winter. The lecturer, in contrast, rejects this by claiming that it is not true the North Slope did not have a plant in the winter and the Edmontosaurs did not have food during winter. She explains that in 1000 years ago the North Slope is warmer than now, and, the sunshine arrived at the earth 24h day. Therefore, warmer temperature and extremely light make a suitable situation for growing plants in summer. With starting winter, these plants died and they had a lot of nutritions. The Edmontosaurus started to eat dead planets in hole winter. Hence, they did not need to migrate to finding food.
Furthermore, unlike the passage which states that the Edmontosaurus lived in herb for migration, the professor argues that living in the herb did not mean they wanted to migration. They lived in herbs for several reasons such as provide extra protection from preditors. In the modern era, we sea Rozelt elk live in the herb in the forest of USA. But they do not migrate.
Finally, although the reading passage says that the Edmontosaurus had physical ability for migration, the speaker disagrees by mentioning that it is true they had physical ability for migration if they did not have children. She also adds that Edmontosaurus could not leave the juveniles in the migration because they would not survive alone. Consequently, it was not possible for Edmontosaurus to migrate such distances
- Imagine that you are planning to take a vacation and are trying to decide between two places to visit Which of these two options do you believe would give you better information about making your choice Why Reading about the places online Discussing them 76
- TPO-23 - Integrated Writing Task Populations of the yellow cedar, a species of tree that is common in northwestern North America, have been steadily declining for more than a century now, since about 1880. Scientists have advanced several hypotheses expla 80
- TPO 41 80
- TOEFL TPO 47 - Integrated Writing Task 81
- TPO 27 70
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, hence, if, so, therefore, in contrast, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.4613686534 48% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 22.412803532 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1517.0 1373.03311258 110% => OK
No of words: 301.0 270.72406181 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03986710963 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68988532322 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 145.348785872 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521594684385 0.540411800872 97% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 419.366225166 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.3985559379 49.2860985944 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8125 110.228320801 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8125 21.698381199 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06452816374 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.27373068433 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301213265536 0.272083759551 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.099452059116 0.0996497079465 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0602289250952 0.0662205650399 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176326520336 0.162205337803 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654138977237 0.0443174109184 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.3589403974 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.2367328918 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 63.6247240618 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.7273730684 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.2008830022 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.