The graph below shows information about the recruitment of teachers in Ontario between 2001
and 2007.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons
where relevant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of English and French language teachers during the period between 2001 and 2007. It can be seen clearly the recruitment rate of French-languages teacher was higher than the figure for English-languages teachers over the period.
According to the data, there was a significant dipped in the large number of French teachers in 2002, from 70 percent to 54 percent. After this, the figure increased to 67 percent in 2003 and then fluctuated, before climbing to 74 percent at the end of the period.
On the other hand, the percentage of English-languages teachers began with 73 percent in 2001, it was higher than the figure for French languages teachers. However, the number of English teachers went down a lot to 40 percent in 2003, and this was followed by showing some fluctuation during the period between 2003 and 2005.
Finally, the proportion of English teachers hit in low of under 30 percent in 2007.
- The two graphs compares that oil was the major energy source in the USA in both 1980 and 1990 and that the number of coal natural gas and hydroelectric power remained stable in much the same proportions
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008 73
- Birth rates in China and the USA 67
- significant rise in world trade 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, so, then, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 800.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03144654088 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95935842745 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.559748427673 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 216.0 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.545477654 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 114.285714286 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0978861807179 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580329721837 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041893207709 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0689048915896 0.15604864568 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371840611006 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.19 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.