Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
Nowadays, the pollution and traffic problems are growing and the best way to solve it, the government need to augmentation the price of petrol. Definitely, I agree to cast a vote for it seeing that some impacts of this method will there few mark-up and make people careful to create decision.
On the one hand, increase the charge of benzine will build community mindset change. Moreover, this limitation purpose to reduce the transportation purchasing power and the reign has to offer other solution such as use take the public transport, using electric-powered transportation or pedaling a bicycle to go to work and others tender which do not use the petrol. Indeed, this subtraction in gasoline, community and the ministry may establish new wisdom and produce the innovation to safe their environment then invent the fresh air. Accordingly, health will be created for everyone and a better for future.
In other one hand, all of transportation has need out of energy from fuel and in case, the society does not matter about the consequence by the dangerous of gas contamination from theirs vehicles. Whereas, even though the gasolene has expensive prices, will not affect people who are wealthy and the community under faction likely to feel partiality. Extremely, this policy prone to conflict in the colony. Therefore, justice should as well be considered for this kind of provision.
In the inference of direction to forwards, the local endorsement are indispensable. Lastly, deliberation and conclusion for mitigate the discoloration be necessary to balanced with optimal solution and the positives-negatives influences.
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 56
- the chart below shows the GDP growt per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 84
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in European country between 1979 and 2004. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labeled coffe and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European Countries. Summarise the information by selectimg and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, lastly, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, well, whereas, as to, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1379.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34496124031 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14631529283 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647286821705 0.561755894193 115% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0610698336 49.4020404114 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.916666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104909899491 0.244688304435 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0372526019497 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.086218088521 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0695439563176 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856913908243 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.