Some people think that it would be better for large companies and industries to move to regional areas outside the urban centers. Do you think the advantages outweighs the disadvantages?
Post this industrialization and urbanization era, people has observed the need that is will be advantages if big corporate houses shift their industries to under-developed and rural areas. It will not only lead advantages for rural areas but also will put limit on rapid and continuous shrinkage of resources in urban areas. However, there will be certain pros and cons as a result of this mobilization, which need to be considered.
Firstly, let us look into positive side of the coin. With respect to rural population, it may bring prosperity, wisdom and wealth. They will get employment at their doorstep without moving to metropolitan cities. An industrialization will be followed by the development of infrastructure, access to basic amenities on their door-step, increase in their property prices and many more. On the other hand, corporate will be get access to cheaper resources, certain tax benefits, lower production cost and adequate government support due to development of rural areas. It will not only beneficial for their operational overheads burden but also will help them effective and satisfactory settlement of corporate social responsibilities. Lastly, this transfer of large factories will lead to free up resources from urban areas which will be, in turn, resolve shrinkage of resources problems of urban cities so that their population can utilize these resources.
This gradual shift of companies will have its own set of demerits. This shift will disturb ecological balance of rural areas. In order to set up industrial, agriculture or forest land need to utilize which will result in reduction in greenery. In addition to urban areas, rural areas will be also get polluted with the vast amount of pollutants generated by these industries. Even though employment will be rise in semi-urban and backward areas, it will be followed by unemployment in urban areas afterwards. In spite of, eradicating urban problems resources problems, unemployment resulted as an aftereffects will boost crime rate in metropolitan cities.
The conclusion, needless to mention that every coin has two sides, so is applicable to movement of large companies. Finally, in my view, even though, there are many merits in favor of shifting of large companies to rural area, but criticality of its aftereffects outweighs benefits achieved out of it.
- You have recently attended a work-related course. Write a letter to your manager and say– What course was it, and when did you take it?– What did you like about it?– What improvements can be made in the future? 81
- Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.Give reasons for you 56
- You have recently attended a work-related course. Write a letter to your manager and say– What course was it, and when did you take it?– What did you like about it?– What improvements can be made in the future? 81
- You are due to start a new job next week but you will not be able to, because you have some problems.Write a letter to your new employer. In you letter:Explain your situationDescribe your problemsTell him/her when you think you can start. 78
- The prevention of health problems and illness is more important than treatment and medicines. Government funding should reflect this.To what extent do you agree? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 595, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'an aftereffect' or simply 'aftereffects'?
Suggestion: an aftereffect; aftereffects
...rces problems, unemployment resulted as an aftereffects will boost crime rate in metropolitan c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, look, may, so, in addition, as a result, in my view, in spite of, with respect to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 7.85571142285 293% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 41.998997996 140% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 371.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36118598383 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38877662729 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11728767299 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.549865229111 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 625.5 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.3183884941 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6111111111 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72222222222 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144912507425 0.244688304435 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0509584960885 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0447794799791 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105156353783 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313458555893 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.