It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree？
Some people think that a nation should encourage all young people enter university to pursue academic studies. From my point of view, this tendency is advantageous but impractical.
In terms of benefit, a high percentage of youngster attending tertiary education has these following points. First, young learners can achieve a qualification which can open the door to better employment prospects with higher salary. In addition, students want to take part in universities because they will have opportunities to learn from lecturers who are expert in their fields. For example, In Germany thanks to the free of charge university education system, the employment rate remains in low level. Second, the economy can benefit from a well-educated workforce who contribute to the sustainable development. People graduating from tertiary institutions may have better work productivity owing to knowledge gained from university. For instance, labor force in Finland in which university education system is open for every learner is evaluated as one of the most efficient worldwide.
On the other hand, offering a massive number of university places in some countries is not feasible. Initially, personal financial may prevent some high school leavers from continuing university education. Not all individuals are capable of paying university tuition fee in several countries. For example, some nations in Africa having problems about security and starvation cannot focus on university education. Next, a high proportion of university attendance will lead to the shortage of educational facilities and infrastructure. Otherwise, efficiency in education and training cannot be guaranteed due to an excessiveness of learners.
In conclusion, it is beneficial to support tertiary education but measures must be taken to solve feasibility related issues.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 78 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree？ 78
- Environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Popular events like the football world cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 73
- An increasing number of people are changing their careers What are the reasons Do you think this is a positive or negative development to society 87
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, second, so, well, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 965.302439024 164% => OK
No of words: 274.0 196.424390244 139% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77737226277 4.92477711251 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14388679644 2.65546596893 118% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 106.607317073 166% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.64598540146 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 511.2 283.868780488 180% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 19.8036257728 43.030603864 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9375 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.125 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 3.70975609756 377% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155707133624 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0496807000459 0.103423049105 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458157275028 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0765371425829 0.15604864568 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590046655739 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.84 61.2550243902 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.3012195122 131% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 11.4140731707 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.95 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 40.7170731707 233% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.