do you agree or disagree? teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classrooms
Since the beginning of the last century, the education has become very significant to our community. Teachers are the most influential factor in the learning process, given that students are affected with their behaviors and ideas. Some people hold the view that teaches should be allowed to reveal their political view in the classrooms, however there is a solid body of evidence that casts doubts in this belief. From a personal perspective, teachers should not make any social or political views known to students given that they could mislead students and waste time. Below I will strive my supporting points in more details.
The fist and foremost point, teachers may hold wrong or bad political view. For example in Egypt during the president election on 2013 some of the teachers wanted to vote to the Muslim Brotherhood candidate and they started to convince the students to vote to the same candidate because they have special agenda which had a bad impact on the Egyptian society. provided that teachers hold an unfair political view, they may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as a role models; so they could follow their behavior. Consequently, teachers should not state their political and social point of view in classrooms.
Next, coupled with mislead, wasting time is another reason why teachers should not make their political views known. Talking about the political subjects may not benefit the students academically. The noteworthy refreshing intelligible statistics revealed by a recent survey conducted by Oxford university found that debate on the political stuffs inside the classrooms could waste students’ time and minimize the learning potential outcomes. Furthermore, there are lots of important subjects that students should learn about to keep themselves update about the huge progress and improvement in several filed such as science and literature, any time waste can delay or jeopardize students’ success. Therefore, teachers should focus on teaching the academic subjects.
Admittedly, there are arguments that teachers could talk about their political and social views in order to broad students’ knowledge and experience. Most of teachers earn a valuable social and political knowledge and that could be a great opportunity for children to maximize their horizon and prepare them to the future career. However, I still affirm that teachers should not reveal their political views in the classes. To that end, students can get this profound knowledge from the political and social class.
Taking everything into consideration, without a doubt teachers should not talk about their political and social perspectives in the classrooms. It is suggested that schools put restricted laws to prohibit undesirable behaviors.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-25 | Christine hanna | 76 | view |
- tpo 15 the spread of the cane toads in Australia 80
- people should never make an important decision alone 70
- do you agree or disagree? young people are more influenced by celebrities' life than older people? 73
- do you agree or disagree? young people today do not give enough time to help in their communities? 81
- do you agree or disagree? it is better for children to choose jobs that are similar to their parents' jobs than to choose jobs that are very different from their parents' jobs? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... my supporting points in more details. The fist and foremost point, teachers ma...
^^^
Line 2, column 138, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...t during the president election on 2013 some of the teachers wanted to vote to the Muslim B...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Provided
...d a bad impact on the Egyptian society. provided that teachers hold an unfair political ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...hey may mislead the students. Moreover, some of the students look to their teachers as a ro...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd social point of view in classrooms. Next, coupled with mislead, wasting time...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cus on teaching the academic subjects. Admittedly, there are arguments that tea...
^^^
Line 4, column 158, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'Most of', you should use 'the' ('Most of the teachers') or simply say ''Most teachers''.
Suggestion: Most of the teachers; Most teachers
...tudents' knowledge and experience. Most of teachers earn a valuable social and political kn...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e from the political and social class. Taking everything into consideration, wi...
^^^
Line 5, column 231, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...laws to prohibit undesirable behaviors.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 15.1003584229 60% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 9.8082437276 194% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 13.8261648746 130% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 43.0788530466 84% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 52.1666666667 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.0752688172 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 436.0 407.700716846 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.45642201835 4.8611393121 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56953094068 4.48103885553 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.792959325 2.67179642975 105% => OK
Unique words: 226.0 212.727598566 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518348623853 0.524837075471 99% => OK
syllable_count: 716.4 618.680645161 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.59856630824 31% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0383601026 48.9658058833 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.285714286 100.406767564 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7619047619 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.61904761905 5.45110844103 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.5376344086 163% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 11.8709677419 59% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446146146153 0.236089414692 189% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15222300332 0.076458572812 199% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104601949269 0.0737576698707 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267540958844 0.150856017488 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.058783849817 0.0645574589148 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 11.7677419355 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 10.9000537634 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.01818996416 108% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 86.8835125448 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.