Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion.
In recent times, educating class room of students who are physically placed inside a hall is considered as an obsolete practice. This is being justified with the help of technological advances in the education sector. While there is modern gadgets convenient a network of learners in current trending world, it is the conventional class room learning teaches parallel aspects to the students.
Admittedly, there are substantial availability of equipment that could simulate a classroom environment for both professors and students. It also allows the subscribers to learn irrespective to their location, availability and time. There is a trend in information and data domain where more number of technicians are being hired to develop user friendly and robust products to support e-learning. Educating through internet is also being considered as a paradigm shift towards a better future. We can also see a lot of software organizations like Udemy, Byju's, Flex are trying to become pioneer in this modern method of education
Nevertheless, our old way of teaching introduced by ancient Greeks where a group of aspirants being enlightened by an instructor will always play a vital role in the field of studies. A class room environment not only teaches the context of the subject but also trains an individual on skills which can never be achieved through online sessions. It is also understandable that digital learning cannot provide facilities for fields which involves a laboratory setup. Few instances of such fields are, civil or construction related work, mechanical or automobile experiments, medical or anatomy related practice. Even though we have access to data relating past, present and predictive future through virtual platforms, it cannot combat with the value additions delivered by an absolute coaching centre.
In conclusion, the growth in modern electronic utilities has made people believe that traditional school teaching is an old practice. However, it is the personal training experience that benefits any learner to a greater extent.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | Sabesan | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | eppa akhil | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-15 | eppa akhil | 73 | view |
| 2018-03-13 | phuongmeooo | 89 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 226, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are modern gadgets'?
Suggestion: there are modern gadgets
...advances in the education sector. While there is modern gadgets convenient a network of learners in cur...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ches parallel aspects to the students. Admittedly, there are substantial availa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eer in this modern method of education Nevertheless, our old way of teaching in...
^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ivered by an absolute coaching centre. In conclusion, the growth in modern elec...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, nevertheless, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1755.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50156739812 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01442566986 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633228840125 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 551.7 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.2676792826 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.357142857 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7857142857 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109273966845 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0362191459599 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0253807043996 0.0667982634062 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608034119523 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0142410251409 0.056905535591 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.