TPO-41 Teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past more than today or not?
Teachers have a significant and remarkable role in people's life either in ancient times or current periods. Although some people argue that the teachers are appreciated and valued by society as much as before, others assume that the instructors do not have good prestige nowadays. In my view, the teachers are used to be more respected in the past in comparison of today so I agree with the latter group and my reasons are elaborated on in the following paragraphs.
First, the teachers are not the mere source of information nowadays. The advent of various assortment of technologies makes people less dependent on teachers. There is no restriction for people to access the other attractive source of information such as the internet. Therefore, there is less need for the teacher to gain knowledge and information compare with the past time. People can easily surf the internet and find out whatever they want about the surrounding world. For instance, when I was senior, my professor considered a final research project for students. The professor was completely preoccupied with his academic research so he did not have enough time to work on his student’s projects. The student gained the indispensable and required information by surfing the net and their professor was as a guide for them. So, by the development of technology the function of instructors is not as effective as before.
Second, the job opportunity was scarce in the past and there were ample obstacles in society for becoming a teacher so a person who became a teacher was a talented and wise person. So the teachers were considered as a high social class of society in the previous time. My father’s memorable experience is a compelling example of this. My father was the sole teacher in his town and he always tried to make their students more passionate about school. The people of his town well-understood the importance of my father’ role by looking at their children’s prosperity so they respected and admired him. Therefore, The rarity and lack of teachers in the past made teachers a hero in society.
In conclusion, although some people believe that the teachers have their reputation as like before, I do not agree with them. The absence of technology was a powerful reason in the past that the teachers used to be the main treasures of information and knowledge. Moreover, because the minority of people had a chance to be a teacher so they were more respected and had an excellent reputation in ancient time.
<br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | donyamalekA | 73 | view |
- TPO-41(INTEGRATED WRITING) 76
- do you agree or disagree with the following statement? young people today have no influence on the important decisions that determine the future of society as a whole. use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 76
- TPO-41 Teachers were more valued and appreciated in the past more than today or not? 73
- some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. do you think this is a good idea? 60
- TPO-44 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 366, Rule ID: PAST_TIME[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pastime'?
Suggestion: pastime
...wledge and information compare with the past time. People can easily surf the internet an...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, look, moreover, second, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 30.0 43.0788530466 70% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 52.1666666667 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.0752688172 186% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2103.0 1977.66487455 106% => OK
No of words: 422.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98341232227 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53239876712 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96042892076 2.67179642975 111% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478672985782 0.524837075471 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 671.4 618.680645161 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7165724272 48.9658058833 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.142857143 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0952380952 20.6045352989 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95238095238 5.45110844103 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 11.8709677419 118% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.85842293907 52% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88709677419 102% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196577744354 0.236089414692 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587859442013 0.076458572812 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0600184740883 0.0737576698707 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141083935006 0.150856017488 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0657010184395 0.0645574589148 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 11.7677419355 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 58.1214874552 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.1575268817 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 86.8835125448 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.