The Salton Sea in California is actually a salty inland lake. The level of salt in the lake's water—what scientists call its salinity—has been increasing steadily for years because the lake's water is evaporating faster than it is being replaced by rainfall or rivers. If the trend continues, the lake's water will soon become so salty that the lake will be unable to support fish and bird populations. The lake would then become essentially a dead zone. Fortunately, there are several ways to reverse the trend that is threatening the lake's health.
One option is direct removal of salt from the lake's water in special desalination facilities. Water from the lake would be pumped into the facilities and heated. This would cause the water to evaporate into steam, while salt and other materials dissolved in the water would be left behind. The steam would then be cooled down and returned to the lake as salt-free water. Gradually, the high salt levels would be reduced and the lake’s overall health would be restored.
Another possible solution is to dilute the salt level in the lake with water from the ocean. Since water in the Pacific Ocean is 20 percent less salty than water in the lake, bringing ocean water into the lake would decrease the lake’s salinity. The ocean water could be delivered through pipelines or canals.
Yet another solution would be to control the lake's salinity by constructing walls to divide the lake into several sections. In the smaller sections, salinity would be allowed to increase. However, in the main and largest section, salinity would be reduced and controlled by, among other things, directing all the freshwater from small rivers in the area to flow into that main section of the lake.
The reading asserts that the water of the Salton Sea in California is becoming more and saltier because of water evaporation, leading to problems for birds and animals population. The passage suggests three main solutions to face the problem. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons proposed by the reading passage.
To start with, the author argues that one fine choice would be to extract all the salt from the water by transferring it into facilities for desalination, so by heating it make the salt remain separated. Then the vapor could be cooled and sent back to the lake. Conversely, the speaker brings up the fact that it is not a practical approach to solve the problem: she maintains that the remained salt and other materials could cause health threats for human. some toxic material will mix in the air and cause damage to man's lives.
Furthermore, the passage holds the view that the salty water of the lake could be diluted by transporting less salt-contained water from the Pacific ocean via pipelines or canals. In contrast, the lecturer underlines the fact that although ocean water can solve the problem, there are limitations in resources to construct such infrastructures by governments. Since the distance between ocean and the kale is about 1000 kilometers, it is unlikely to be possible to build the canals.
Finally, it is stated in the passage that another solution for this problem could be to make some system of walls, and make different zones in the lake. In this way, the small parts will salinity will increase, but in the main and large parts, the salinity would decline and be under control. Additionally, freshwater could be added to the main part from small rivers, and prevent the high level of salinity in the lake. On the contrary, the lecturer dismisses this issue due to the fact that geological conditions in the area are not stable. For instance, there are frequent earthquakes there and one move of them could destroy the walls and all parts will fall apart and separated water will mix again.
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal finance support. 73
- Many consumers ignore commercial advertisements. In response, advertising companies have started using a new tactic, called “buzzing." The advertisers hire people, buzzers, who personally promote (buzz) products to people they know or meet. The key 78
- pros and cons of the let it burn policy in the case of Yellowstone park 3
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things related to schoolwork 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 244, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ree main solutions to face the problem. The lecturer, however, finds the idea dubio...
^^^
Line 4, column 173, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'makes'?
Suggestion: makes
...ties for desalination, so by heating it make the salt remain separated. Then the vap...
^^^^
Line 4, column 459, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...s could cause health threats for human. some toxic material will mix in the air and ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 519, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'man'.
Suggestion: man
...will mix in the air and cause damage to mans lives. Furthermore, the passage ho...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, finally, furthermore, however, if, so, then, for instance, in contrast, on the contrary, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 5.04856512141 277% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 7.30242825607 219% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.01324503311 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1373.03311258 126% => OK
No of words: 353.0 270.72406181 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90651558074 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33454660006 4.04702891845 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60460597121 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 145.348785872 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535410764873 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 419.366225166 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.871511372 49.2860985944 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.466666667 110.228320801 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5333333333 21.698381199 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06452816374 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 4.45695364238 224% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229466497379 0.272083759551 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0714322269482 0.0996497079465 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666455814021 0.0662205650399 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133751656262 0.162205337803 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0111598394388 0.0443174109184 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.3589403974 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 63.6247240618 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.