An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition.
The crux of the topic is that patient should have access to his or doctor's records whether the doctor treats similar cases or not and that might ailing patients to choose better doctor for him or her. I personally disagree with the statement for the following reasons and Iam going to provide some epitome to bolster my stance.
First of all, doctors are one of the most respected profession in our society and also considered as next to god, they have the power to save a life. Relationship between patient and a doctor is based on trust and respect. If the patient is skeptical about his doctor's qualification or caliber then distress introduced between then, and even when the doctor is right, the patient will be ambiguous about the treatment. And, sometimes believe can cure and help to overcome a situation. So, any conditions which can create distrust between doctor and his patient must be eradicated.
On the other hand, it might be possible that a recent graduate doctor is prolific and have astute to precept an illness, but as he does not have an experience in his field patients tend to avoid him. That might cause harm to a doctor's profession and patient's health and overall healthcare system. Also, sometime a new kind of pathogenic bacteria or viruses introduced and due to our recent medical advancement, we found new viruses in a regular basis. For example, when first ebola came into our knowledge no one had any idea or experience how to deal with it and by rigorous research and experiment and treatment, we can now somehow cure some cases. If patients think no one has experience in that field and so he will not eager to get treated by anyone, this would be fatal.
On the flip-side, people might argue that patient must have access to the records for better choice because it would be better for patients and patients have advance hand in treatment. It might be true that in some cases, because experience on similar cases might help to easily discern a disease and help patients, but that not always is the case, sometimes can create distrust between patient and doctor. For example, when penicillin first introduced it had no past but, even though people first skeptical, for later days penicillin had a huge effect on humankind. If patients refuses on the basis on doctors experience on medicine or on records they might have died.
At the epilogue of the topic, I would say that we should not introduced any system that can hamper relationship between patients and doctors. Also, a name in the profession can not be made from thin air, it requires years of practice and study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | JENIRSHAH | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | samruddh_shah | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Harshali_15 | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | Masterji | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-26 | sarahaduwa | 66 | view |
- Essay topics: The emperor Claudius of Rome ruled an empire spanning three continents between 41 and 54 CE. His reign was of massive importance to the history of ancient European civilization. In fact, the emperor was among the most innovative, fair, and w 91
- TPO-09 - Independent Writing TaskDo you agree or disagree with the following statement?Technology has made children less creative than they were in the past.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- An ailing patient should have easy access to his or her doctor’s record of treating similarly afflicted patients. Through gaining such access, the ailing patient may better determine whether the doctor is competent to treat that medical condition. 66
- TPO-08 - Independent Writing Task Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The greatness of individuals can be decided only by those who live after them, not by their contemporaries. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to better', 'to well'
Suggestion: to better; to well
...nd that might ailing patients to choose better doctor for him or her. I personally dis...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 227, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'doctors'' or 'doctor's'?
Suggestion: doctors'; doctor's
...o avoid him. That might cause harm to a doctors profession and patients health and over...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 519, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...hough people first skeptical, for later days penicillin had a huge effect on humanki...
^^^^
Line 5, column 62, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'introduce'
Suggestion: introduce
...e topic, I would say that we should not introduced any system that can hamper relationship...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, then, for example, kind of, first of all, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 31.0 14.8657303371 209% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 33.0505617978 112% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2158.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76379690949 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52614647631 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476821192053 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 677.7 704.065955056 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0841445358 60.3974514979 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.888888889 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1666666667 23.4991977007 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307161215228 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105686177509 0.0831039109588 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.122903351023 0.0758088955206 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188358975611 0.150359130593 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112344764496 0.0667264976115 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 48.8420337079 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.1639044944 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.