Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves?
Although such topics, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on how the poverty-stricken countries can combat with their adverse situation can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My view is that irrespective of the many arguments on either side, rich countries must share their help in aiding poorer nations. However, the impoverished nations should use this aid to build a better support system for life-long survival. Through the course of this essay, I would like to put forth my points and calculations considering both sides of the argument.
To begin with, any wealthy country having abundance of resources and technical facilities should strive to aid instant help to the deprived; Hence making the world a better place, and as a result they will gain potential stand in front of the other countries. Adding to this, they can also make a host of investment in these backward countries to help them generate wealth, and in turn take a fair share of it. For instance, the United States has helped Africa to uplift itself from issues like poverty.
There are a few aspects that needs special consideration by the bureaucrats of economically backward countries. They must ensure to use these aids to improve their situation by educating and strengthening their own communities. For this they must set-up visions to forge better conditions in the future to help them prosper and become powerful in the coming years. For example, Singapore was hit by adverse condition few years back after partitioning with Malaysia. They used all the help as a platform to curb the aggravated situation; thus, becoming one of the emerging countries of the world today.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence I reckon that rich nations should help poor nations for a big social cause, and at the same time the authorities of the poor nations should use them to build a powerful system today to flourish in the future. I am inclined to believe that, in this way all the countries will prosper and grow in the coming years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-27 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | camp.vandna@gmail.com | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-26 | junaid_sh | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
| 2019-08-02 | mspoonam | 78 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 78
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. 78
- Many childhood diseases can now be prevented through the use of vaccines.Should parents be made by law to immunise their children against common diseases or should individuals have the right to choose not to immunise their children? You should use your ow 78
- Some people think that modern technology is making people more sociable, while others think it is making them less sociable. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- Some businesses find that their new employees lack basic interpersonal skills such as cooperative skills. What are the causes? Suggest possible solutions. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, i reckon, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82886145699 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.6971288982 49.4020404114 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.5 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159833221839 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477293888268 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057013485307 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0970205341854 0.151304729494 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0488088893064 0.056905535591 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.