"A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. " use specific reasons and examples to support your answer
I agree with the statement that the teacher should be able to connect and relate with the students.
The connection between the teacher and her students is very important for a smooth transfer of thoughts. The knowledge imparted by the teacher should be well perceived by her students. Sometimes the student can be weak and unable to understand what the teacher is talking about. In such a situation, the teacher should be able to relate and come up with an innovative solution to explain the issue.
A teacher should be able to look into the student’s mind, and think in a similar manner to know the root problem. For example, our physics teacher would explain the lever mechanism through an example of the sea saw; of how the weight application on one side, lifts up the other side. Such a simple solution can be provided to a theory which could be difficult to understand by reading only.
On the other hand, a teacher who is well read and has abundant amount of knowledge will not be able to explain it in the same way. The same lever mechanism could be explained through theories and mathematical derivations which school students might not understand. In this case, the entire purpose of teaching and learning is defeated, since nobody is benefiting from the activity.
When a teacher knows the student’s way of learning and absorbing information, she/he can use particular techniques of teaching. This is only possible if the teacher can relate to the student and thus takes extra efforts to go out of her way to teach.
Biological lessons can be made interesting by actually stepping out of the class and giving real life examples of say, transpiration and evaporation. The same phenomenons can be explained sitting in class through diagrams and text, but the amount of knowledge gained is less since a weaker student will not be able to connect with what the teacher is explaining.
To conclude, a student’s formative years in school are crucial and the knowledge imparted is best perceived in those years. Hence, the effectiveness is important which can be achieved through a cohesive environment generated by the teachers and students.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answers. 83
- Should governments spend more money on improving roads and highways, or should governments spend more money on improving public transportation (buses, trains, subways? Why? Use specific reasons and details to develop your essay 90
- Statement of purpose 70
- how does writing impact today s world 100
- role of architecture in nation building 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 74, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a similar manner" with adverb for "similar"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...into the student's mind, and think in a similar manner to know the root problem. For example, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, hence, if, look, so, thus, well, for example, talking about, in the same way, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 9.8082437276 173% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 43.0788530466 28% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 52.1666666667 105% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1977.66487455 92% => OK
No of words: 364.0 407.700716846 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98351648352 4.8611393121 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83998440342 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 212.727598566 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486263736264 0.524837075471 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 618.680645161 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 10.0 3.08781362007 324% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.94265232975 121% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.7385376715 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.705882353 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4117647059 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 5.45110844103 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.53405017921 154% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242518531128 0.236089414692 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921630583714 0.076458572812 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0412796504068 0.0737576698707 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137669278149 0.150856017488 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034811408574 0.0645574589148 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 11.7677419355 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 10.9000537634 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.01818996416 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 86.8835125448 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
We are expecting: No. of Words: 350 while No. of Different Words: 200
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.