the bar chart illustrates the average annual pay for doctors and other workers in 2004 in some countries
The bar chart compares and contrasts the data in the amount of payments for doctors and other workers in several countries, which are measured in thousand usd, in 2004.
A closer look at the diagram highlights the fact that doctors average money were higher than other workers in all countries.
Among the categories, us is best regarded for its returns for both jobs. In comparison to germany, United Kingdom, doctors were given 110 000 usd, approximately, which were 5000 more than that of in germany. The same data were illustrated in other workers proportion, 110 000 and 90 000 usd were the payments in us and germany, respectively. On the other hand, A comsumes the same quatity of 60% in other workers category. By contrast, Czech Republic had the lowest average money paid for doctors and other workers, standing at 20000 usd in average, which were 10000 less than D in comparison.
- The diagram illustrates the male and female population between 1990 and 2000 in 6 countries 61
- People mainly type on keyboards nowadays rather than write things down by hand. As a result, handwritng skills are getting worse. Do you agree or disagree with this statement. What are the benefits of writing by hand. 89
- the line graph illustrates changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000. 78
- The chart shows the percentage of deaths from heart disease and cancer, and calories consumed from unrefined planted foods.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 89
- Some people think that environmental problems should be solved on a global scale while others believe it is better to deal with them nationally. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 147, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a thousand'.
Suggestion: a thousand
...everal countries, which are measured in thousand usd, in 2004. A closer look at the...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 170, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... are measured in thousand usd, in 2004. A closer look at the diagram highlights ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...msumes the same quatity of 60% in other workers category. By contrast, Czech Republic h...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 744.0 965.302439024 77% => OK
No of words: 152.0 196.424390244 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89473684211 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51124308557 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62855088944 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.572368421053 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 219.6 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.5544997009 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.285714286 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7142857143 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.85714285714 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280310813961 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137969676931 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780420376433 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2148771487 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061198908179 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.