The line graph below shows the population size, birth rate and the death rate of
England and Wales from 1700 to 2000. Summarise the information by selecting and
reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the information about the population size, and also
compares the birth and mortality rate of England and Wales for a period of 300 years starting
1700. It is evident that the population showed an upward trend, whereas death and birth
rate showed a fluctuating trend.
The death and the birth rates followed a similar trend from 1700-1950. From 1700-1750, an
increase was seen in both these, with the birth rate rising from 30 to 40 births per 1000 people
and the death rate increasing from 27 to 37 per 1000 people. There was stability in both for
the next 50 years, after which there was a sharp fall with both rates reaching an all time low
of around 20 per thousand people by 1950. In between, from 1850 to 1900, birth and death
rate again showed a leveling off. From 1950 to 2000, the death rate remained stable. In
contrast, the birth rate increased dramatically, from 22 to 35 births per 1000 people.
The three centuries saw a dramatic escalation in population from 2.5 million in 1700 to 50
million in 2000, with a short period of stability from 1750-1800.
- The charts provide information about students in 2007 who were happy with different facilities at a university of UK Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different material that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country .Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparisons where relevant . 56
- The graph below shows the average retirement age of males and females in six countries in 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different material that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country . Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features , and make comparison where relevant . 84
- The diagram below shows the number of marriages in the UK between 1951 and 2001 The data given is for all marriages remarriages any partner and first marriages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons whe 90
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 929.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7641025641 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43259695432 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54358974359 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.765754023 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.222222222 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.88888888889 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.366907637379 0.215688989381 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185965029174 0.103423049105 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688962895313 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149100699763 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623650252406 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.19 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.