tpo41
Both the reading and listening parts offer two opposite views about the regulations for handling and storing coal ash. While the passage lists three disadvantages of restricted rule, the professor refutes all of them and claims some clues to call them into the questions.
First of all, the text highlights the existed regulations as the accountable rules for controlling the handling and storing coal ash. On the other hand, the lecturer rejects the sufficiency of those regulations. As she explains, the current law about the usage of the liner is required merely for new landfills and disposal pound which does not prevent the environmental hazardous of coal ash. As old landfills and pounds are exceptional from this law, they can release coal ash in the environment which leaks into the groundwater and contaminate the drinking waters. Consequently, the existed law is not sufficient to prevent controlling and storing coal ash.
Secondly, the article asserts that this regulation could cause the concern which prevents people from purchasing the stuff with recycled coal ash. On the contrary, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this assertion by providing an example of people's reaction toward other dangerous substance recycled materials. According to her assertion, the handling and storage of Mercury, which is a hazards substance, are also monitored very strictly; however, people do not show worry about the use of its recycling in the other materials. Therefore, the control would not affect people's attitude toward materials made by recycled coal ash.
Finally, meanwhile, the passage assumes that the increased cost of electricity which would not be welcomed by the public as another issue of this regulation; the professor, on the other hand, rejects this assumption too. As she describes this monitoring would cost 50 billion dollars for power companies and is a wealthy cost. Otherwise, by the division of entire cost among the families, there will be one percent increment in average electricity cost for pre-family which is a petty expense in comparison to owning a healthy environment.
- TPO 22-integrated writing 73
- tpo52 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better for colleagues or classmates to communicate in person than through emails in order to do a project 58
- statement 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students who keep rooms their neat and organized are more successful than those who do not. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...clues to call them into the questions. First of all, the text highlights the ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...vent controlling and storing coal ash. Secondly, the article asserts that this ...
^^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'hazards'' or 'hazard's'?
Suggestion: hazards'; hazard's
...ling and storage of Mercury, which is a hazards substance, are also monitored very stri...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d materials made by recycled coal ash. Finally, meanwhile, the passage assumes ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, finally, first, however, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 30.3222958057 135% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.01324503311 219% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1808.0 1373.03311258 132% => OK
No of words: 337.0 270.72406181 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3649851632 5.08290768461 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.952833886 2.5805825403 114% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 145.348785872 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566765578635 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 419.366225166 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.25165562914 320% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 21.2450331126 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8884912558 49.2860985944 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.142857143 110.228320801 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0714285714 21.698381199 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.446120458156 0.272083759551 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154394977606 0.0996497079465 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100542761726 0.0662205650399 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237638103807 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0932078681468 0.0443174109184 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.3589403974 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.8541721854 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.0289183223 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.2367328918 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.42419426049 114% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 63.6247240618 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.498013245 110% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 81.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.