Some people think money spent in developing technology for space exploration is not justified. There are more beneficial ways to spend this money. To what extend do you agree or disagree.
Million of dollars are spent for space research, technology and trainings, to discover the outer space and its hidden secrets. Some people think that the money is using for development is a good step, but for others is huge and not acceptable, they can benefit from it in other ways that help people.
We are living in this space, in one its planet “Earth”; spending money for some scientist and researchers is a good stop for our future. First, spending money on developed equipment’s that aid to pass difficulties in danger places in space and help to discover if there is life and other creatures. Second, money should be spent to determine if there is any other planet like Earth, have living resources such as, water, oxygen or oil. Moreover, many planets aren’t realized yet and can cause threat to Earth, due to meteorites that are spread in the space and many falls on and cause damages to Earth. For example, the Russian Aerospace are working on developing their sector, since they’ve found millions of meteors are swimming in the space and danger on us. In my opinion I disagree, since God who created this world can control everything.
On the other hand, money can be used in many ways to help nations, rather than spending them on developing space technology. Millions of dollars can save millions of lives, it can stop poverty and starvation in many continents like Africa, Asia and South America and help these people to survive and develop their country. Second, this money can be used to discover treatments for chronic diseases to end it and give life to young or old individuals. However, money can be delivered for other technology, to solve the pollution issue and find a final solution for this threat, that affecting on global warming and leading to increase in the temperature of Earth and melting the North Pole. For example, NASA spend a lot of money each year on developing their sector, but until today they didn’t discover the next part of the moon. From my side I agree, that this money can help many people to stay alive.
In conclusion, many people prefer to stop spending money on space technology, where they can benefit from it for better things and develop their countries. In my opinion, I think that this money will assist many people to stay alive and have a healthy life.
- Some people think high end technology can prevent and cut down the rate of committing crime Do you agree or disagree 92
- In many countries the level of crime is increasing and crimes are becoming more violent Why do you think this is and what can be done about it 61
- Many people nowadays tend to marry and have children in their thirties rather than at a younger age Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some people prefer to spend time with one or two close friends. Others choose to spend time with a large number of friends. Comparethe advantages of each choice. Which of these two ways of spending time do you prefer? Use specific reasons to support your 33
- Some people think competitive sports, such as football, are valuable because they can gather people with different ages and cultures together. Some think competitive sports can cause problems because people are from different groups and countries. Discuss 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a Million'.
Suggestion: A Million
Million of dollars are spent for space research...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 709, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (NASA) must be used with a third-person verb: 'spends'.
Suggestion: spends
...lting the North Pole. For example, NASA spend a lot of money each year on developing ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, i think, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 10.4138276553 240% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1950.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 403.0 315.596192385 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.83870967742 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.48049772903 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60725921506 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491315136476 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 606.6 506.74238477 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 4.76152304609 210% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.2914673814 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.875 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.1875 20.7667163134 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31438366931 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124085820396 0.084324248473 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0567863574778 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233027648569 0.151304729494 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303239222759 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.4159519038 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.