The government should allocate more funding to teach science rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress. To what extent do you agree?
Science subjects are very helpful to develop individually and their nation. It is often argued that spending more money on science subjects enhances country status. I agree completely with the given statement. Both country and individuals develop by allocating funds science studies.
All the developed countries are spending huge money on science. The schools in a country can develop his technical skills and ideology. Students who are interested in their own subjects like agriculture, medicine, robotics can enrich their knowledge that directly helps their own country. Moreover, the beginners also show interest in entering competitive filed and increases their capability. For instance, events like science fare technical fests are so much helpful for the beginners. This also reflects the development of the nation.
Country’s economic status and fame among other countries increases. Many students are migrating to other countries in search of providing infrastructure and opportunities. Government by providing such lab facilities helps the students to innovate in their own country. National economic growth increases by the enriching of science and technology. The pride of the country will also affect by such practices.the awareness in the people also changes by increasing technology.
In conclusion, the best way to succeed the nation in present scenario is by developing the science and technical education. Science and their application make the life easier, makes the nation proud that leads to its development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ziaul1891 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | ajayjain831 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Sai sushma | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | eppa akhil | 56 | view |
- Giving lectures in auditoriums to large numbers of students is an old way of teaching. With the technology available today, there is no justification for it, and everything should be done online. To what extend do you agree or disagree? Give your opinion. 73
- Rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximise chances of employment. To wh 11
- rising university fees and scarce employment prospects for graduates have led some people to say that universities should not teach arts subjects, like philosophy and history, and only offer practical degree courses that maximize chances of employment. To 78
- Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by the local farmers. Would the advantages of 78
- the bar chart below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Science subjects are very helpful to dev...
^^^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...op by allocating funds science studies. All the developed countries are spending...
^^^
Line 3, column 389, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...ogy. The pride of the country will also affect by such practices.the awareness in the peo...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1309.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 229.0 315.596192385 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.71615720524 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 4.20363070211 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9824720115 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 176.041082164 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.576419213974 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.3579375576 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.0 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.4705882353 20.7667163134 65% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.06120827912 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223595089601 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0796527421757 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596742409621 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142484830791 0.151304729494 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810350569624 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.36 50.2224549098 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.3 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.