The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries.
The line graph and table compare the global water use by agriculture, industrial use, and domestic use between 1900 and 2000 and the water consumption in Brazil and the Democratic Republic of Congo in 2000. Overall, a similar upward trend can be observed in the world water use. The water consumption per person in two different countries is proportional to their population and irrigated land.
To begin with, water used by agriculture occupied the most proportion, followed by industrial use and water was applied for domestic. There was a dramatic steady increase in the water used by agriculture, which started at 500 km2 then ended at 3000km2. The other two sectors both stared at a low point of roughly 0 km2. While industrial use rose significantly to approximately 1500 km2, there was a slight increase in the water was used by domestic to roughly 200 km2 over the period.
In the year 2000, the populations of Brazil and the Congo were 176 million and 5.2 million respectively. Water consumption per person in Brazil, at 359m³, was much higher than that in the Congo, at only 8m³, and this could be explained by the fact that Brazil had 265 times more irrigated land.
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 84
- The charts below show that what UK graduate and postgraduates students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008. 78
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade*-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries. 56
- Many old buildings protected by law are part of a nation’s history. Some people think they should be knocked down and replaced by news ones. How important is it to maintain old buildings? Should history stand in the way of progress? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, then, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84653465347 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73312612835 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569306930693 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 294.3 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2884141438 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4444444444 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302026095485 0.215688989381 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13300842395 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892520360998 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208796703738 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131253596962 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.01 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.