The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.
The bar chart gives information on the money that they earned per week on fast food in the UK. The line graph provides data on the consumption of those items from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, high-come class people had the highest percentage of the expenditure while low-income group remained the lowest.
According to the bar graph, hamburger gained some popularity. The high class people British citizens controlled a large share which was about 25 pence per person. In addition, their spending was also higher than the average and low-income groups. Fish and chips were occupied at the second. Moreover, the average income class people enjoyed eating hamburger but their spending fish and chips were about 8 percent more. Both of the average income and low-income groups showed similar patterns with both eating less than high come class people.
As is presented in the line graph, people usually ate pizza more than other foods. Pizza consumption in Britain was highest n 1970. In this year, the consumption of hamburger and fish and chips less than pizza. After period of 20 years, the fish and chips reached a peak at 500 mg per person. During that time, pizza became less popular.
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 56
- The table below describes percentages of home schooled students in SomeCountry in 1999-2004. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown. 11
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 73
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 78
- The bar charts show the various activities in the evening and how they often do between 1980 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, moreover, second, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95979899497 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3371750712 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597989949749 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0619093705 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.5 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2142857143 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.64285714286 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152950950559 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522064285491 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0729710775762 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100889012031 0.15604864568 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103554417777 0.0819641961636 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.