people now have freedom to work and live anywhere in the world due to the development of communication technology and transportation.
Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, with the help of science and technology owing to which folk now have the freedom to work and live for the study purpose, anywhere in the world due to development of communication technology and transportation facilities. It brings myriad of advantages instead of disadvantages.
At the outset, advantages of having freedom to work and live are that they can get better job opportunity, for the development of their family, and they get privacy from their relatives. A person get better salary as well as freedom to work because of which they live anywhere in the world. To cite an example, waterloo university, a renowned university of Canada, shown in their survey that forty percent of human beings from India, one of the developing country, are migrating to the developed nation for the betterment of their future. Moreover, sometimes they have to stay away from their family members but with the help of communication technology and transportation, the problem is solved, whilst they can earn more and will be able to give better future to their child. Also, they can satisfy the bread and butter of their family. In order to get privacy, some people travel to abroad for work or study. For example, a statistical data has been found by Times Of India shown that prime reason behind migration was to get privacy.
On the other hand, the disadvantage of this freedom is that they may be deviated from their goals and can also follow the wrong path which will be noxious in future. Beside, rather than living together joint families are converted in nuclear families because for their own growth they travel to gulf places in world. For instance, after completion of higher secondary school for better colleges and for brighter they travel to places and result into fights between families.
In conclusion, It become consequential for people to work and live in world because advantages outweigh disadvantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2022-12-09 | Mollymaul | 84 | view |
| 2022-03-11 | lennie.butera | 89 | view |
| 2021-09-23 | roopdeep | 56 | view |
| 2021-09-19 | Vivek chovatiya | 56 | view |
- Individual can do nothing to improve the enviroment; only goverment and large companies make differece.what extended do you agree or disagree? 56
- Fast food has become so popular worldwide that it is destroying the nutritional quality of food what do you think because of this the traditional food and cooking method is being forgotten Do you agree or disagree with the statement give reasonns for your 69
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with others via internet and no need of face to face contact Is it brings positive or negative development 39
- some believe that sharing too much information ts too good regarding scientific research, business, and academics. others believe that only valuable and impotant information should be shared freely. discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- some people think the increasing business and culture contact between countries bring many positive developments. Others say that it causes the loss of national identities. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ow the wrong path which will be noxious in future. Beside, rather than living together jo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'becomes'?
Suggestion: becomes
...ts between families. In conclusion, It become consequential for people to work and li...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, may, moreover, second, so, well, as to, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1606.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01875 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74317334487 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.1596080947 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.538461538 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6153846154 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283096578337 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110113932688 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116479827204 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227200730174 0.151304729494 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128635034789 0.056905535591 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.