The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts compare the percentages of British students in a particular England university who can speak another language aside from English in two separate years.
Overall, the vast majority of British students can speak at least one language as well as English in both years. It is also noticeable that Spanish was the most widely spoken second language among the group of surveyed students.
The number of British students who do not speak another language aside from English decreased from 20% in 2000 to 10% in 2010. Similarly, the figure for students who can only speak French dropped by 5% to 10% in 2010. In comparison with the proportion of students who can communicate using the German language, it remained stable at a tenth after 10 years.
For the remaining 3 categories; Spanish only, another language and two other languages, their figures rose by 5% in 2010, however, Spanish remained to be the common spoken foreign language with more than a third of the surveyed group. The proportions of students who can talk with another language and two other languages went up to a quarter and 15% respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
| 2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- The chart below displays the shares of expenditure on selected categories in the United States, Canada, the UK and Japan in 2009. 73
- The bar graph below gives some of the most reported issues among people living in UK cities in 2008. 78
- The graphs below show the total production and sources of electricity in two countries in 1980 and 2000. 67
- The line graph below shows how much money was spent on cars in four different countries in Asia 73
- The line graph below shows the number of serious crimes that occurred in Newport city centre from 2003-2012. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 222, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: comparison,
...French dropped by 5% to 10% in 2010. In comparison with the proportion of students who can...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, similarly, so, third, well, at least, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 941.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 189.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97883597884 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62531983705 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550264550265 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4268934389 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.625 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.625 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.875 5.23603664747 169% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.370133576274 0.215688989381 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17425026529 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0866111999585 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.233463172347 0.15604864568 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538877064559 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.