The charts below show the average spending for British in 1971 and 2001.
The pie charts illustrate the average expenditure of households in Britain for over 30 years, starting in 1971.
Overall, among the seven categories mentioned, the average amount of money spent was increased significantly to cars, computers, and restaurants, while others declined its level.
Cars by far have been the primary expenditure in Britain which started from just over a fifth and rose dramatically to nearly half of the total in the end year given. Next, was on computers and restaurants were data with upward trends, figures from almost a tiny fraction and roughly a tenth of the overall in 2001 respectively. Similarly, in the last period, expenses had grown even more, wherein computers had recorded a percentage of five times higher-12% total than the previous figure, whereas restaurants were doubled its total percentage from 7% to 14%.
In terms of food, it began with almost half of the total, which marked as the highest point as opposed to books and furniture from 6% and 9% to 1 % drop respectively. Petrol itself decreased to nearly a tiny fraction in 2001.
- The chart below shows the amount of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years . 61
- The table below shows the amount fish caught, in thousands tonnes , in 2008 and 2015 by eight European countries. 78
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- The graphs below show the primary social networking of British users in 2010 and projected figures for 2018. 61
- The graph below shows the amount of fruit purchased annually by a large supermarket chain in India 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 236, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...estaurants were data with upward trends, figures from almost a tiny fraction and ...
^^
Line 7, column 131, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t as opposed to books and furniture from 6% and 9% to 1 % drop respectively. Petr...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08379888268 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80473585385 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653631284916 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.6693966325 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5714285714 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.14285714286 5.23603664747 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101246632314 0.215688989381 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.053970763638 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07592996168 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0808358770409 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0865474787254 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.