The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in the fast food restaurants vetween 2003 and 2013.
The bar chart compares the frequency which is divided into five categories (every day, several times a week, once a week, once or twice a week, a few times a year and never) in terms of fast food consuming (measured in percentages) over the time period from 2003 to 2013.
Looking closely at the chart in detail, we can clearly see that the number of people who went to fast food restaurants once or several times a week fell throughout the period from 2003 to 2013, starting with around 31% and 17% respectively and finishing at around 28% and 16% respectively, although there was a minor increase between 2003 and 2006. The amount of those who acted more extremely (every day and never) also decreased over the same period, but less significantly, both changing by about 1%.
By contrast, after seeing a decrease during 2003 and 2006, the quantity of people who ate fast food once or twice a month showed a sharply upward trend between the following years, beginning with 25% in 2006, finally reaching around 33% in 2013 and overtaking that of people who ate more frequently in 2013. The percentage of people who consumed fast food a few times a year also rose during the same period from about 13% in 2003 to 15% in 2006 and 2013.
Overall, the frequency of fast food consuming peak in 2006. Currently, most people go to fast food restaurants once or twice a month, which might result from the awareness of healthy lifestyles.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-15 | Claudia1208 | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation, such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money. Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situations.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 61
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in the fast food restaurants vetween 2003 and 2013. 67
- The charts below shows the value of one country's exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015. 73
- In many countries, average life expectancy has been increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and for society as a whole? Suggest some solutions. 78
- Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, if, look, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 3.15609756098 285% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 253.0 196.424390244 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70355731225 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47182564964 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 36.0 22.4926829268 160% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 97.9533416625 43.030603864 228% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 170.0 112.824112599 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 36.1428571429 22.9334400587 158% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292285375813 0.215688989381 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.14385468625 0.103423049105 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780334654646 0.0843802449381 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183601331416 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680829274611 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 13.2329268293 142% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.86 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 16.4 10.9970731707 149% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.