Sports stars are paid too much for what they do. Discuss.
There is a controversial issue about the income of famous athletes. Some social workers state that their payments are excessively large. However, some coaches argue that they deserve that money. In this essay, I will discuss both points of view and agree with the idea that they receive too earning.
Let us start with reasons why some social workers believe that well-known athletes are overly paid. The first reason is that their salary frequently does not correspond to their contribution. Many sportsmen have huge incomes, because they play in trendy sports clubs, such as Manchester United or Real Madrid, but in fact, unlike miners and teachers, they do little for economic growth. Another factor is that their wages causes outrages in society. Many employees have the average salary, which is enough to lead a modest life, but when they see how much sportsmen earn, they feel resentment to such enormous injustice. Therefore, after analyzing, it is clear that athletes' payment is extremely large.
Nevertheless, some coaches advocate that outstanding sportsmen receive fair wages. They justify their opinion with the following arguments. Firstly, they usually spend their life training hard. Most people enviously observe how famous athletes live in affluence, but they do not realize how much they work to gain such best results in world competitions. Secondly, they mostly earn large money on advertisement. It is common belief in society that athletes make a living by participating in contests, but actually their income is largely formed from advertising products on TV, which is also under gigantic taxation. As a result, after analyzing, it is obvious that popular athletes earn fair salaries.
In conclusion, although some coaches propagate that sportsmen with fame have decent earnings, I think that their salary should be reduced to an approprate level for the above mentioned arguments.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-02-21 | Wulan | 63 | view |
| 2023-01-20 | ielts_tony | 84 | view |
| 2022-01-15 | shadow1222 | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-25 | urvi eva | 73 | view |
| 2021-04-24 | urvi eva | 67 | view |
- The Internet is replacing books. What extent do you agree? 56
- Some employers want to be able to contact their staff all times, especially holidays.Does this development have more advantages than disadvantages? 89
- Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change.Discuss both and give your opinion. 84
- What are the pros and cons of using public transport? 84
- You have heard that a developer plans to build a shopping centre near your home Write a letter to the council In your letter say how you heard about the plan explain how you feel about it ask for more information about it 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...ad a modest life, but when they see how much sportsmen earn, they feel resentment to...
^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'athletes'' or 'athlete's'?
Suggestion: athletes'; athlete's
...fore, after analyzing, it is clear that athletes payment is extremely large. Neverthe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, i think, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 39.0 24.0651302605 162% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35880398671 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62582501498 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637873754153 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 490.5 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.3237783209 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.6111111111 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7222222222 20.7667163134 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199080603087 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504761706788 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575315336709 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106848563923 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0471146214516 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.