Technological innovations have affected our lives. Do you agree or disagree?
The importance of technological innovation in human life, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of these advancements has sparked an on going controversy over the potential impact of this trend on individuals in recent years. Public’s opinion about this phenomenon vary from person to person as some say that technology uprise put an individual on edge, while other says its positive effect plays a vital role for betterment in life. The essay will focus on the effects of high-tech revolution on everyday life and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the innovations is a threat but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that many people are losing jobs due to machines are increasingly taking over the role of human. Similarly, source of income for the human are degrading causing failure in their daily expenditures. With regards to an article published by the Harvard University, it is revealed that the proportion of Americans employed in manufacturing has dropped from 30 per cents to 10 percent today. Apart from that these advancement such as smartphones has engaged one keeping unproductive.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe that technological revolution are also significant as it has made life more accurate and helpful. Moreover, these help in the form of computer which is the electronic marvel is been used in almost every sector like education, medical, scientific labs, robotics, airplanes, transportation and space research. As an illustration, extensive research has shown that uprising system such as mobile phones, internet, computers and many other, in our life has filled the communication and travelling gaps. Thus, ever-growing innovations can play a crucial role for both economical and social stance.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that the positive effects of the phenomenon far outweighs its negative. Hence it is correct to presume this notion as a blessing for the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-22 | namdev190@gmail.com | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-06 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-09-21 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2020-12-09 | Alireza.r.m | 94 | view |
| 2020-11-10 | Mahdi_Farhani | 85 | view |
- Nowadays environmental problems are too big to be managed by individual persons orindividual countries. In other words, it is an international problem. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 80
- The illiterates of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write, but those who cannot learn, unlearn, and relearn. Agree or Disagree? 85
- Creativity is inborn skill or can be developed through learning? Your opinion 77
- Positive and negative effects of today’s communication. 11
- Some people think that certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 185, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
...ce of these advancements has sparked an on going controversy over the potential impact o...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...individual on edge, while other says its positive effect plays a vital role for b...
^^
Line 3, column 527, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this advancement' or 'these advancements'?
Suggestion: this advancement; these advancements
...ts to 10 percent today. Apart from that these advancement such as smartphones has engaged one kee...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 129, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... phenomenon far outweighs its negative. Hence it is correct to presume this notion as...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, similarly, so, thus, while, apart from, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1207.87684729 146% => OK
No of words: 330.0 242.827586207 136% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3303030303 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05231550396 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 209.0 139.433497537 150% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633333333333 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 379.143842365 149% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4999474016 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.642857143 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.25397266985 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0615106855526 0.242375264174 25% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0201706189805 0.0925447433944 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0277775287689 0.071462118173 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.032400613551 0.151781067708 21% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0239333112179 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.