Summarize the points made in the lecture. Be ensure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage.
In contrast to the reading passage which emphasizes on letting employees select four working days who want to select and provided three reasons to support. However, the professor explain that four working day schedule does not add value both to employee as well as the company and refutes each of the reading points.
First, the reading claims that four working day reduce the financial burden of the company as the worker are ready to accept reduce payment. However, professor refutes this
point by say that less workers means company need to hire more employees which add up cost, training new employee, their health insurance and plans, ultimately increasing the financial burden of the company.
Second, the reading posit that reducing working days reduces the unemployment rate. The professor opposes this by saying that reduced working days means the company will force their employees to accomplish their five working days task in just four day which again increase their work burden.
Finally, according to the reading, reduce working days prove enough free time which they can send with their family, make more personal free space. However, the professor claims that by doing four working days schedule employees will decrease their job stability, the company will prefer five working days employee for promotion and retain them on financial crises over four working days employees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-16 | Manjushree | 3 | view |
| 2019-12-12 | shahabaddin_solaimanian | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-25 | Qwe | 3 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Qwe | 70 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture. Be ensure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific points made in the reading passage 3
- • Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Boys and girls should attend separate schools. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship. 83
- A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 70
- Q: A teacher’s ability to relate well with students is more important than excellent knowledge of the subject being taught. 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...ule does not add value both to employee as well as the company and refutes each of the rea...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun workers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...ofessor refutes this point by say that less workers means company need to hire more...
^^^^
Line 5, column 301, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...y, the company will prefer five working days employee for promotion and retain them ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, second, so, well, in contrast, as well as, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 10.4613686534 10% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 22.412803532 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 30.3222958057 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1179.0 1373.03311258 86% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31081081081 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.25648700983 2.5805825403 87% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 145.348785872 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.536036036036 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 419.366225166 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 13.0662251656 61% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 21.2450331126 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.3587385257 49.2860985944 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.375 110.228320801 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.75 21.698381199 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.25 7.06452816374 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.27373068433 23% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0403608962921 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0266713816778 0.0996497079465 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0183199360635 0.0662205650399 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0299731628825 0.162205337803 18% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0165792374424 0.0443174109184 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.3589403974 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.8541721854 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 11.0289183223 114% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 63.6247240618 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.498013245 122% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.