Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The environment has been a subject that attracts great attention. Some people argue that each person can not be able to take action to develop a sustainable environment and only authorities and powerful companies can greatly contribute to improve the surrounding area. From my perspective, I totally disagree with this viewpoint.
On the one hand, the government and large companies have intensive influences on protecting the environment. Firstly, due to their responsibility and power, they can raise funds from citizens and organize the campaign to contribute to protect environmental sustainability as reforestation, wild animal conservation. Secondly, they can have more opportunities to raise environmentally friendly consciousness of the local people by exposing advertisements through social media. In addition to this, governments can set some strict rules to restrict using fossil fuel, illegal logging and encourage residents to utilize public transportation and alternative resources.
On the other hand, individuals can be responsible for remaining green environment as well. Each person can do small activities such as plant trees, clean their surroundings or using biodegradable items to be more eco-friendly regardless of their ages and jobs. Moreover, youngsters should take part in some volunteer activities with no interest to help the organization access to the environmental issue. For instance, many celebrities all around the world take a lot of money to hire helicopters carrying burgeon of water in order to put out the burning forest in Brazil this year.
In conclusion, the authorities and powerful companies may have more duty on remaining a sustainable surrounding but individuals still need to pay attention and endeavor to solve environmental problems.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-17 | subodh | 84 | view |
2020-01-17 | kingdangyeu0606 | 84 | view |
2019-12-27 | Maleeha | 84 | view |
2019-11-19 | chioma49 | 67 | view |
2019-11-18 | Mario Nese | 84 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1523.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.72556390977 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39633514694 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639097744361 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4707980855 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.916666667 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1666666667 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.5833333333 7.06120827912 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181617746171 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639235008263 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376280419671 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102615943861 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029724306346 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.95 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.