The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015.
The given chart shows how many social networking sites are used by the people in Canada in 2014 and 2015. As is presented in the diagram, the percentage of internet users who visit just one site is quite considerably.
According to the chart, more people (36%) using just one site in 2014 compared to the 2015 year`s statistics (28%). However, the indicators are decreasing slightly regarding using two sites, although the percentage of users are almost the same in visiting two sites as we see from the chart below.
Regarding four or five sites using by Canadian people, the numbers are quite changeable and are decreasing noticeably (5% - 8% and 2% - 4%).
Overall, the percentage of using one site is rising sharply in comparison to other indicators of site visiting.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | Shivam7090 | 84 | view |
| 2019-11-24 | Sagar Gurung | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-20 | phanduydat | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
| 2019-11-06 | cindycornelia98 | 67 | view |
- It is better for children to grow up in the countryside than in a big city 43
- Computers are now the basis of the modern world. They should, therefore, be introduced into classrooms, and their programs used for direct teaching purposes. However, dependence on computers in teaching may carry a certain degree of risk to students. 84
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s
- Some people think that universities should not provide so much theoretical but give more practical training throughout their courses 71
- The charts show how tourism to the two countries changed over a 50-year period. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 10, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
...iceably 5% - 8% and 2% - 4%. Overall. the percentage of using one site is rising ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 645.0 965.302439024 67% => OK
No of words: 130.0 196.424390244 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96153846154 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.37664837539 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71309445886 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 78.0 106.607317073 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 202.5 283.868780488 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.415020214 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381905858967 0.215688989381 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.197854678691 0.103423049105 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.150187632367 0.0843802449381 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217255072655 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959935533906 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.