Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
There has been a heated debate about the publication of information in the fields of science, business and academy. While some people are favor of sharing data for the sake of human beings, others believe that they are so confidential that they become unable to be exchanged.
For those who oppose the idea of sharing data, they want to protect the intellectual property rights of the inventors. This school of thought is entirely logical since scientists or experts spend great amount of time doing researches to obtain valuable bits of information. Sharing these data freely, therefore, violates their ownership and demotivates their efforts to make a contribution to the society. Furthermore, some kinds of data can be exploited for malicious purposes. To exemplify, thousands of mobile phone users receive undesirable calls made by advertising companies every day. Another incident is the recent data breach of Facebook which had detrimental effect on 87 million users worldwide. Keeping important information private is thus an optimal solution to save customers.
In contrast, supporters of disclosing information publicly assume that this act greatly benefits human kinds. Exchanging information plays a vital role in countering monopoly in some particular fields. Take HIV treatments as an example, the current price for the medication is extortionately expensive because only few companies have the formula of producing this drug. If this manufacturing secret is popularized, more corporations are able to produce this medicine, resulting in a significant drop in its price. As a consequence, more patients can receive proper treatments and fewer people lose their life. Additionally, sharing important information bridges the wealthy gaps between nations. Some developing countries are encountering financial difficulty to conduct scientific experiments so that they cannot gain precious achievements. However, their citizens are also human and they deserve a chance to develop. Sharing information is synonymous with offering equally favorable conditions for the international development.
In my opinion, the publication of information is absolutely necessary because of its humane values. Not only does it ensure the equal opportunities for the development of nations but it also contributes to making our life much better. For its positive meanings, I think human beings should exchange as much information as possible.
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that governments should try to reduce air traffic by tax 84
- The charts below show the number of girls per 100 boys in all levels of education Summarize the information by selecting and reporting on the main features and make comparison where relevant 88
- The table below shows the number of language learners who used different methods of learning English between the years 2000 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Modes of learni 82
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both these views and g 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 50, Rule ID: ABSOLUTELY_ESSENTIAL[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessary'.
Suggestion: necessary
...nion, the publication of information is absolutely necessary because of its humane values. Not only ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...change as much information as possible.
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, thus, while, i think, in contrast, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2078.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 365.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69315068493 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11244693968 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652054794521 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 669.6 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0412467343 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.9523809524 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.380952381 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7619047619 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237307723383 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063243586975 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0526111684655 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144771061766 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0453919908185 0.056905535591 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 78.4519038076 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.