Some students prefer study alone. Others prefer to study with a group of students. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Nowadays, most students have many learning methods. While some students prefer to study alone, others prefer to study with a group of students. In my opinion, I prefer study with a group to study alone. Because study in a group has many benefits. There are some reasons and examples for my viewpoint.
Firstly, it helps us expand knowledge by learning from each other. Secondly, it takes a little time. If you solve the problem together in a group, it will be faster and will only in a less time. Moreover, if you share homework together, it would be more interesting than study alone. Finally, study alone can not solve the task better than studying in a group and can not have many good ideal. For example, studying with a group of students will be more informative than studying alone.
In conclusion, With the above benefits I prefer to study with a group of students.
- Cheating in exams is one of the biggest problems in education. What do you think about reasons for this? Give some solution to solve the problem. 56
- How can you protect the environment Write a paragraph about 100 130 words to express your opinion 84
- Write a paragraph of 120 150 words about traffic in big cities in Viet Nam 75
- Cheating in exams is one of the biggest problems in education What do you think about reasons for this Give some solution to solve the problem 69
- There are many leisure activities on average day Nowadays both children and adult enjoy playing computer games What do you think about playing video games Good or not good Why 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...efer study with a group to study alone. Because study in a group has many benefits. The...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 13.1623246493 30% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 7.30460921844 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 41.998997996 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 8.3376753507 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 747.0 1615.20841683 46% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 154.0 315.596192385 49% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85064935065 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 4.20363070211 84% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69082792085 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 176.041082164 48% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 506.74238477 45% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7594756214 49.4020404114 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 67.9090909091 106.682146367 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.0 20.7667163134 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.90909090909 7.06120827912 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.471339262476 0.244688304435 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.204058691225 0.084324248473 242% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.190509378196 0.0667982634062 285% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.363416252815 0.151304729494 240% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.141169138422 0.056905535591 248% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 13.0946893788 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.26 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 78.4519038076 45% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.