The table below gives information related to population growth, average birth per woman, life expectancy at birth in countries with different income levels in 2000 and 2004.summarise the information below and make comparison where relevant.
The given esclacates the rate of population growth, average birth per woman, life expectancy at birth in high , middle and low income countries during 2000 and 2004.
Overall, it is clear that population growth and average birth per woman was highest in low income nations. However, in higher income countries, rate of life expectancy at birth was more over the given period .
To begin with, the population growth was highest in case of low income countries which was 2.0% in 2000 then followed by 1.8% in next two years. Surprisingly, constant rate of population growth was recorded in middle income countries that was 0.9% ;whereas, in high income countries population grew at about 0.7% over two years.
L
Probing further, there was 1.7 average birth per woman in high income countries, which followed by 2.1 in middle income countries. It is interesting to note that 3.9 and 3.7 average births per woman were in low income countries in 2000 and 2004 respectively. Interestingly, the life expectancy at birth was highest in high income countries which was 78.0 . In low income countries the life expectancy increased from 58.1 to 58.8 and 69.1 to 70.0 in middle income countries.
- Universities should accept equal number of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that industrial growth is necessary to solve poverty, but some other people argue that industrial is creating environment problems and it should be stopped discuss both sides and give your opinion. 84
- the chart below shows the percentage of adults of different age groups in the UK who used internet everyday from 2003 2006 87
- The diagram illustrates the various stages of life of honey bees. 61
- The two charts show the percentage of pollutants entering part of ocean in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 10, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given esclacates the rate of population growt...
^^
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given esclacates the rate of population growth, average b...
^^
Line 1, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... woman, life expectancy at birth in high , middle and low income countries during ...
^^
Line 5, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uring 2000 and 2004. Overall, it is clear that population growth and average...
^^
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n low income nations. However, in higher income countries, rate of life expectanc...
^^
Line 5, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... at birth was more over the given period . To begin with, the population grow...
^^
Line 9, column 52, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...th, the population growth was highest in case of low income countries which was 2...
^^
Line 9, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h was 2.0% in 2000 then followed by 1.8% in next two years. Surprisingly, constan...
^^
Line 15, column 199, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat 3.9 and 3.7 average births per woman were in low income countries in 2000 and...
^^
Line 15, column 356, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... in high income countries which was 78.0 . In low income countries the life expect...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 26.3917525773 133% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1002.0 937.175257732 107% => OK
No of words: 197.0 206.0 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08629441624 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65819017378 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 127.690721649 67% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.43654822335 0.622605031667 70% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 290.88556701 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 27.8558901722 44.8134815571 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.333333333 76.5299724578 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 16.8248392259 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.55555555556 4.34317383033 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 2.54639175258 393% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338828363223 0.216113520407 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.20228379592 0.0766984524023 264% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854211485107 0.0603063233224 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277356522658 0.12726935374 218% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839136613354 0.0580467560999 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 8.37731958763 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.6 7.59969072165 87% => OK
difficult_words: 24.0 41.2886597938 58% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.