Expenditure, revenue of children's charity in USA the year 2016.
The pie chart gives information about a children's charity, which is present in USA, on how much money they spent and got back on the year 2016.
Overall, most of revenue came form donated food, while Investment income and Governemnet grants contributed least percentages to the total income. In contrast, Program services accounted for most of their spendings, while management and general were the minor outgoings. Total revenue source was little above the outgoings.
By looking at the chart, Donated food accounted as most of their revenue source, which is 86.6%. Next, Community Contributions holds the second largest revenue source, which is 10.4% of overall income. After this, Program revenue contributed 2.2%. Investment income, Goverement Grants contributed same amount of income, which is only 0.2% of total revenue. The other income accounted only 0.4% of total revenue.
Similarly, in outgoing's, program servies occupied the peak position, which is 95.8%. There are other two services in expenditures items, Fundraising and Management and General, accounting for 2.6% and 1.6% respectively. The total amount of income was $53,561,580, which was just sufficient to cover their spenidings of $53,224,896.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 67 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 78 | view |
| 2024-09-27 | Sheikh Sajib | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-26 | meoconxinhxan | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-14 | Huyenlbg87 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 97, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contributed the least'.
Suggestion: contributed the least
...nvestment income and Governemnet grants contributed least percentages to the total income. In con...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, second, similarly, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64324324324 4.92477711251 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75493315413 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605405405405 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.5343936214 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.0 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4166666667 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.23603664747 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.112472666182 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0428209557535 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0568622334577 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079441881515 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0736765953905 0.0819641961636 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.4140731707 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.