The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The pie charts given below illustrate the percentage of average household spending in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010.
Overall, it seen the biggest value in Japan was other goods and services while in Malaysia the hugest percentage was housing.
To begin from Japan, the biggest household spending was other goods and services at 29%. This followed by food at 24% and housing which made up 21%. The lowest expenditures was from transport and health care with average 20% and 6%.
On the other hand, in Malaysia household expenditures had the hugest average percentage was housing at 34% . The second highest was food at 27%. The major class which uses the smallest was other goods and services at 26% transport used 10% and health care used 3%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-18 | vuongthaolinh | 85 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | huongab123 | view | |
| 2023-06-19 | mykhanh | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-07 | saminhsn | view | |
| 2023-01-14 | Kaito Mori | view |
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 67
- The table below give information on the proporion of carbohydrates, protein, and fat in three different diets. 56
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- In some countries, young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting universities studies.Discuss the advantage and disadvantage for young people who decide to do this. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 12, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alaysia in the year 2010. Overall, it seen the biggest value in Japan was othe...
^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...st average percentage was housing at 34% . The second highest was food at 27%. The...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 33.7804878049 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 627.0 965.302439024 65% => OK
No of words: 128.0 196.424390244 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8984375 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.36358566101 3.73543355544 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39726723811 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 69.0 106.607317073 65% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5390625 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 181.8 283.868780488 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.5655034312 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.375 112.824112599 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264715746413 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136787665061 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.189946048123 0.0843802449381 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223074734632 0.15604864568 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.222725705586 0.0819641961636 272% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.02 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.