The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph illustrates the number of admissions to the entertainment venues in 2009, while the table shows the prices to those venues within the same period.
Overall, cinema had the highest number of admissions, far more than the other categories. Furthermore, the prices of football games were the most expensive ones out of all the event commodities.
First of all, looking at the bar graph, people attended cinemas the most, with more than 1 million admissions in 2009. This figure was almost three times higher than that of theme parks, which only accounted for nearly 400 thousand visitors. Sports were the least visited venue, with its number of admissions only around 180 thousands.
Second, as displayed in the table, football games had the most expensive admissions price, ranging from $71 to $75 per ticket, and from $280 to $298 for each family tickets. Theme parks price also came close to those figures, with $70 for one ticket and $210 for family ones. Last but not least, cinema had the cheapest admission price, only $15 for a single ticket and $55 for a combo ticket of four people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | Tran Mai Phuong | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-07 | wehbe | 67 | view |
| 2017-03-14 | The cureee | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business and countries that have not.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 61
- Teenagers are spending an increasing amount of time on the internet and this is having a negative effect on their social skills Do you agree or disagree 51
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, look, second, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.8670212766 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45725683156 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627659574468 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 265.5 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1835873576 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137753146646 0.215688989381 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601360181874 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720602871844 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992437369725 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0867646093588 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.