The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the three countries from 1990 to 2004.
The depicted line graph enumerates the information about unemployment ratio in three respective countries between 1990 to 2004.
Overall, it is evident that the Uk and Japan had experienced a downward trend with some fluctuation over the time period, whereas in the USA it was upwards, albeit with some volatility.
To initiate, the most marked change had seen in Japan, gradually increase from a tiny portion in 1990 to approximately 5 percent in 1996, which later plummeted to just over 1 percent in 2004. Moreover, the figure for the UK had experienced a certain oscillation throughout the years, which obviously leads to the lowest trend over fourteen years, which is nearly 2 percent in 2002.
Furthermore, the figure for the USA had faced a certain vacillation in the first four years. Likewise, it significantly rises in the following years, peaking from exactly 2 percent in 1990 to around 6 percent in the year 2000. However, it slowly slumped in the remaining two years at 5 percent in 2004.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 87 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | Milan karki | 70 | view |
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about the consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with a projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevan 73
- The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features. 84
- The table below gives information about languages with the most natives speakers. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- People today move to new cities or new countries more than ever before. What challenges do they experience? What strategies are there to meet these challenges? 78
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86451801101 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.589285714286 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3257883202 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.14285714286 5.23603664747 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16620394952 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850400781782 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113649969896 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122696116079 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131653147131 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.