TPO10
The lecture and the article are both about the cause of otter population declining. The writer of the article feels that the environmental pollution is the more important cause of otter declining and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claims made by the author and he is of the opinion thet these explanations are faulty and says the predators is more important factor of otter declining.
To begine with, the author states that the sourse of pollution is near such as oil rigs . The specific argument is challenged by the lecture. He is of the opinion that if the pollution is the cause of otter declining, The coarps of them will be found on the beach but we can not see any dead body near the see. Therefore the predators kill and eat otters.
Secondly, The author suggests that the number of other small species who are living in this area are declining too because the pollution has a great effect on all of species. The lecture, however, rebuts this by mentioning that wales are disapear because of human hunters and so orches dont have another sourse of food so they predate oll of small mammals in the sea.
Last but not least, the writer posits that pollution theory can explain the unequall pattern of otter declining. In contrast, the lecture position is that orches have large body and they can not predate mammals in the shallow and rocky places so the number of otter in such that area are higher than other areas that orches can predate otter easily.
- TPO13 80
- TPO 24 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In order to be well-informed, a person must get information from many different news resources.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 68
- Do you agree or disagree with the following satetement? parents today are more involve in their childrens education than were parents in the past. use specifice reosons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...g and provide three reasons of support. The lecture challenges the claims made by t...
^^^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...se of pollution is near such as oil rigs . The specific argument is challenged by ...
^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...can not see any dead body near the see. Therefore the predators kill and eat otters. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 287, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... because of human hunters and so orches dont have another sourse of food so they pre...
^^^^
Line 13, column 43, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...st but not least, the writer posits that pollution theory can explain the unequal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 5.04856512141 99% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 22.412803532 80% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 30.3222958057 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.01324503311 160% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1243.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 263.0 270.72406181 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72623574144 5.08290768461 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35231542439 2.5805825403 91% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 145.348785872 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498098859316 0.540411800872 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 388.8 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 3.25607064018 31% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.4816452 49.2860985944 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 110.228320801 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9090909091 21.698381199 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269656803875 0.272083759551 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.098573947171 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058080175908 0.0662205650399 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.157318822754 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034850130636 0.0443174109184 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.3589403974 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.8541721854 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.45 12.2367328918 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.42419426049 96% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.