In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
100% of the world population will die tomorrow for the reason of being obesity or heart attack for the reason of eating a large amount of junk foods. The alarming plight raise a wake-up call in society as the consequence of remarkable and significant rising of people who suffered from health problems. This concern leads to a suggestion that should government impose a higher tax on this kind of food. Personally, I concur with this statement but have a little doubt on the possibility of applying this in practical.
The idea of imposing higher tax on fast food is anchored for a reason that the consequence of this action will lead to an increasing in prices. Therefore, the number of people who can afford this meal will reduce as a result of basic relationship in economy, higher price - lower demand. For instance, a teenager boy who receives 2 dollars of allowance each day might have enough money to buy a hamburger at a price of 2 dollars; but if a hamburger is sold at 3 dollars as a result of higher consumption tax, this boy would have to consider whether buy it or not because he could not afford this meal. In addition, the revenue from tax for government might witness an increasing in general, leading to a surplus in total federal fund. This surplus could be used as a support for national health fund in raising public awareness of the harmful effect of eating too much fast food.
However, this suggestion is fragile and devoid of substance because many governments have to take this issue in considering the two side effect on both general economic and social life. It can not be denied that income tax is the primary source for any government and this tax contribution would be decreased as a results of reducing sales. Moreover, eating is the basic right of human being and imposing higher tax on fast food in order to reduce the consumption of this food could raise a clear debate in society.
Subsequently weighing all the afore mention, it can be safety to state that imposing a higher tax on junk food is a necessary action but many factors need to be considered such as the tax rate or practical application process.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | mikeboss268 | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | Sakil | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-15 | xa1en | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | Hieutrungnguyen | 89 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | nhaothuy | 67 | view |
- The first car appeared on British roads in 1888. By the year 2000 theremay be as many as 29 million vehicles on British roads.Alternative forms of transport should be encouraged andinternational laws introduced to control car ownership and use.To what ext 84
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...instance, a teenager boy who receives 2 dollar of allowance each day might have enough...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...oney to buy a hamburger at a price of 2 dollar; but if a hamburger is sold at 3 dollar...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'dollar' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'dollars'.
Suggestion: dollars
...dollar; but if a hamburger is sold at 3 dollar as a result of higher consumption tax, ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 878, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ul effect of eating too much fast food. However, this suggestion in fragile and ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 313, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a result' or simply 'results'?
Suggestion: a result; results
... tax contribution would be decreased as a results of reducing sales. Moreover, eating is ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 490, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('clearly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('debate') instead of another adjective.
...he consumption of this food could raise a clearly debate in society. Subsequently weighing ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould raise a clearly debate in society. Subsequently weighing all the afore ment...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Subsequently,
...raise a clearly debate in society. Subsequently weighing all the afore mention, it can ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in general, kind of, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1772.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 379.0 315.596192385 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.67546174142 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41224685777 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63799218537 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503957783641 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 558.9 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.06732101 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.307692308 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.1538461538 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.01903807615 159% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.35240425706 0.244688304435 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138477392108 0.084324248473 164% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754916503089 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211616881142 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630665806566 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 50.2224549098 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.46 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.