Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods.
To what extent do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal?
After the industrial revolution countries care more and more about being productive, and now they are compared to each other by the level of national production and export of commodities. Although it might be beneficial for country's economy, I believe that its disadvantages outweigh privileges.
First of all, manufacturing commodities needs raw materials, which usually are limited resources. In order to climb the production rate each country has two options, to mine and use its own existent resources, or to import from other lands. Each case eventually leads to overuse of global natural resources and damages the delicate balance of environment. Secondly, the great deal of goods which are being produced every year, as it can be seen in current years, must be sold to people, who sometimes do not actually need them. This complicated process includes advertisements which encourage people purchasing unnecessary, occasionally useless, stuff. As a result, individuals would be inspired to have a consuming culture, meaning work more to buy more, and their enthusiasm of owning goods would never fulfill.
Of course it should be borne in mind that growing overall productions generates government huge money, which is definitely advantageous. A wealthier state can improve country's infrastructures like roads, medical equipment, and educational and sport facilities, and consequently bring remarkably more welfare for its citizens. But if every government thinks that way, our planet would endure horrific disasters.
In conclusion, I am of the opinion that in spite of some profitable outcomes earned due to increasing goods' production, the final outcomes would be unfavorable for humans and environment both. This is because the policy of unlimited production hurts earth, and also because it expands the culture of over-consuming between people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | moeinynsi | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | simran1168 | 61 | view |
| 2016-12-13 | katey | 61 | view |
| 2016-12-13 | katey | 84 | view |
- Some people think that the best way to improve road safety is to increase the minimum legal age for driving a car or motor-bike. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- Some people believe that when busy parents do not have a lot of time to spend with their children, the best use of that time is to have fun playing games or sports. Others believe that it is best to use that time doing things together that are related to 76
- Did bees (a type of insect) exist on Earth as early as 200 million years ago? Such a theory is supported by the discovery of very old fossil structures that resemble bee nests. The structures have been found inside 200- million-year-old fossilized trees i 76
- In some countries the quality of life in larger cities is declining. Why do you think this is happening? What measures can be taken to stop it? 84
- Some people believe that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programs (for example working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to younger children).To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'goods'' or 'good's'?
Suggestion: goods'; good's
...table outcomes earned due to increasing goods production, the final outcomes would be...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, consequently, first, if, second, secondly, so, thus, in conclusion, of course, as a result, first of all, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 283.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.60777385159 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08661643048 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6925795053 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 7.0 0.809619238477 865% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.6246141542 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.076923077 106.682146367 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7692307692 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6153846154 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168750062315 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512101003731 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370687484942 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0959278299018 0.151304729494 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0300641388104 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.