Medical technology is responsible for the human's life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Now days medical treatment is very good thing for human beings with this people can maintain their health. In the earlier time people do not have any medical technology they always do their treatment with homemade amides no doubt it takes lots of time to relief from injuries but it protect internal injuries very properly. Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. I am totally agreed with this statement.
Firstly, when people face diseases they go to doctor advice and take medicine. Moreover, if a person gets a serious disease like cancer and other this type of disease they face lots of problem. A person who has money to get proper treatment they invest is but some people who do not have money they can’t get a treatment so the government helps that person. After that now day’s medical field gets lots of facilities like few years back there is not any cancer treatment available in medical field but now they find the solution of lots of these types of disease.
Furthermore, medical technology has got easy way to get relief lots of people have a positive effect of this technology. But this technology is invented in foreign countries people have to gone there to get proper treatment. For example in India lots of people go for medical check and have a treatment of this disease many film stars also have a better treatment there. Moreover Bollywood actresses go there for plastic surgery.
To conclude, I think that medical technology is very helpful for people and also for their health
- Does video communication with doctors help patients to cure any disease. Pros and cons 55
- Government should build more roads to allow more vehicle owner or improve the network of public transport 55
- Any invention that you think proved beneficial or detrimental to society? 11
- The idea of space travel is fantastic these days and scientists are very fascinated towards it. However, there are many environmental problems in our planets that we should resolve first before considering space travel that would cost a significant sum. w 77
- Personal development is the base for professional development. To what extent do you agree 65
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s very good thing for human beings with this people can maintain their health. In th...
^^^^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'protects'?
Suggestion: protects
... of time to relief from injuries but it protect internal injuries very properly. Medica...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: LOTS_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'lots of problems'.
Suggestion: lots of problems
...nd other this type of disease they face lots of problem. A person who has money to get proper t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 372, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...ars also have a better treatment there. Moreover Bollywood actresses go there for plasti...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ful for people and also for their health
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, for example, i think, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1292.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93129770992 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52532479315 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 139.433497537 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507633587786 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3413918594 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3846153846 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.76923076923 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193325119171 0.242375264174 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985314463192 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127567496071 0.071462118173 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146575817059 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.088864499088 0.0609392437508 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.