The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The table information about the percentage of students registered in four types of schools. The survey was done on specialist, grammar, voluntary-controlled, and community schools in 2000, 2005, and 2009.
Overall, the students attendance depicted the proportion of community schools had an upward trend while other pupils became reluctant to attend in other types during the research time.
In these years, specialist schools witnessed an almost steady trend about 11 percent. grammar schools pupils registration also decreased and became half during this period. Twenty-four percent of students were keen to be in these type of schools in 2000 however, it went down to 12% in 2009.
The condition for voluntary-controlled schools was different from the others. these types of schools had the most pupils number among others in 2009 although it plunged to 20% in the last year. this depicted community schools became more popular in these years due to their considerable upward attendance trend from 12 to 58 percent in 2000 to 2009, respectively. In the first years most of the students wanted to be in voluntary-controlled schools while the community schools reached them and took their share during 10 years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-27 | Rizvi007 | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | rose_3012 | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-21 | MaKay1990 | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | harshiniharshini | 61 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree, explain your reasoning. In developing and supporting your position, you 50
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparis 73
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are equally important for a country. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- SOP for Ph.D.in medicinal chemistry 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...2000, 2005, and 2009. Overall, the students attendance depicted the proportion of c...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 87, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Grammar
...n almost steady trend about 11 percent. grammar schools pupils registration also decrea...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 79, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: These
... schools was different from the others. these types of schools had the most pupils nu...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...ugh it plunged to 20% in the last year. this depicted community schools became more ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1036.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39583333333 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17417900037 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541666666667 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.755951899 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.6 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204745927003 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0924471328058 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445574414667 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143851913808 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0226463241329 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.