Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.
To what extent do you agree with this statement??
From the beginning of time, arts such as music and theatre have been a crucial part of society as a whole as it determines the identity of the people living in that society. I believe that investment in arts is as important as in public services and this essay will highlight some of the reasons why it is equally important as public welfare.
Some people believe that public welfare is more important than arts such as music and theater because the infrastructure for basic needs such as transportation, living, and food supply is the fundamental need of any society. As every government has limited financial resources it should focus on public services rather than on arts and cultural activities. Another reason why people think that public welfare must be a priority is that arts do not add any value to their life. Because investments by the government in this sector does not directly affect the life of an individual. For example, if a government decides to open a theatre in a city then it will not help the general public but if that same amount is invested in improving the transportation of the city it would be more helpful for all the people living in that region.
On the other hand, the most vital advantage and the most obvious one is that it gives the people of that country or region their heritage and gives them a sense of belonging to their home. For example, Bhangra is a folk dance of Punjab(India) which is world-famous and gives a unique identity to the people living in that country. Another significant advantage is not only it provides rich culture it also a source of livelihood for thousands of people. Today, the entertainment sector is worth billions of dollars and without government investments, it would have been impossible. For instance, the music industry in the USA is the biggest market there is and it provides a livelihood for millions of people working there.
In conclusion, I think that there should be a balance in investment by the government because both arts and public services are equally important for society as a whole and one cannot be compared to the other as both have their own benefits.
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment only governments and large companies can make a difference To what extent do you agree or disagree 81
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?? 73
- Government investment in the arts, such as music and theatre, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead.To what extent do you agree with this statement?? 73
- Some universities now offer their courses on the Internet so that people can study online. Is this a positive or negative development?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 56
- Learning about the past has no value for those of us living in the present.To what extent do you agree or disagree?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... services and this essay will highlight some of the reasons why it is equally important as ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tre in a city then it will not help the general public but if that same amount is invested in ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 837, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r all the people living in that region. On the other hand, the most vital advant...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other as both have their own benefits.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1781.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77479892761 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73164958421 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.45308310992 0.561755894193 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.1872763916 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.0 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6923076923 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.84615384615 7.06120827912 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180275878255 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691936615997 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.057497024964 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118004549728 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613593772626 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 50.2224549098 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.78957915832 189% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.