The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors
The argument concludes that, offering free tuition policy will reduce the rate of professors' leave and attract new professors.
However, there are some other factors to be considered before making a decision. Like there might be some technical issue regarding laboratory facilities, research scopes and other unwanted administrative complexities for which the professors tend to shift. If a professor gets better offer from another university with an opportunity to work in an advanced lab, he will surely shift neglecting the free tuition offer.
In order to attract new professors, the university should launch program focusing on it's publication, research facilities, collaboration with famous technical firms. The new professors will be interested to join when he finds enough scopes to carry on his research work.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-08 | Keerthi98 | 33 | view |
2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 58 | view |
2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 63 | view |
2019-10-16 | Deepali24 | 69 | view |
2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 49 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 30
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish 33
- Today, the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of the society in which they are sold.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 56
- The graph and table below give information on water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.6327345309 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.9520958084 39% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 11.1786427146 18% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 13.6137724551 22% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 5.0 28.8173652695 17% => OK
Preposition: 17.0 55.5748502994 31% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 2260.96107784 31% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 124.0 441.139720559 28% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68548387097 5.12650576532 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 4.56307096286 73% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98656155938 2.78398813304 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 204.123752495 43% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.701612903226 0.468620217663 150% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 705.55239521 31% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59920159681 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.96107784431 20% => OK
Article: 3.0 8.76447105788 34% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.70958083832 37% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.22255489022 47% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 19.7664670659 30% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8157850535 57.8364921388 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 119.503703932 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 23.324526521 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 5.70786347227 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 5.15768463074 58% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.25449101796 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.20758483034 61% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 6.88822355289 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.67664670659 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138624472923 0.218282227539 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0649748290855 0.0743258471296 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515140030018 0.0701772020484 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942762640191 0.128457276422 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0254246996541 0.0628817314937 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.3799401198 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 48.3550499002 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.1628742515 156% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 12.197005988 111% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.72 12.5979740519 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32208582834 108% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 98.500998004 35% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.9071856287 134% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.